Transfer Rumour Joe Hart

Would u have him

  • Yes

  • No

  • Im sitting on the fence with Cheese on Toast

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
flibbyflob said:
Not the round they in but for the group stage yes.

They might not let Hart go until they have qualified which would make sense despite the huge lead they have.
Click to expand...

Once Jasper Cillessen moves to Barcelona I imagine things will speed along pretty quickly.
 

I am still not sure about taking Hart. Part of me thinks keep going with Stekkers and Robles as back up - saves a hell of a lot of money. If Hart came he would want to be no.1 and Robles would have to moved out.
 
Ihaters said:
Tim Howard was good though, I'd happily take the Tim Howard that arrived at Goodison and played years of quality... its the last few years of decline everyone remembers. Before that he was very good.
Click to expand...
He was only ever a good keeper never a great keeper certainly not to play in the Prem in his last three years!
Joe Hart if signed should only be chosen on ability any clangers drop him unlike where Timmy just got left in IMO it cost RM his job!
 
Joey66 said:
He was only ever a good keeper never a great keeper certainly not to play in the Prem in his last three years!
Joe Hart if signed should only be chosen on ability any clangers drop him unlike where Timmy just got left in IMO it cost RM his job!
Click to expand...

Praise be for that Joey.
 

toffeejack said:
still don't understand why city are paying so much for a 33 year old when hart isn't exactly awful.
Click to expand...

Because:

A - They can.
B - Hart is awful at being part of a back line that Guardiola wants to start attacks from with the ball at feet.

So he's not a good goalkeeper in the eyes of Guardiola; that doesn't mean he's not actually a good goalkeeper though.
 
Tubey said:
Because:

A - They can.
B - Hart is awful at being part of a back line that Guardiola wants to start attacks from with the ball at feet.

So he's not a good goalkeeper in the eyes of Guardiola; that doesn't mean he's not actually a good goalkeeper though.
Click to expand...
I don't understand Guardiola on this one, as City have hardly been hoofball merchants during their oil fueled Renaissance, during which Hart has been a virtual ever present. Personally I think Guardiola is a beaut
 
Joey66 said:
Yes but the first season under RM all blues fans were not saying that record points etc, but I agree with our defensive frailties, and Timmy in goal that season it should have been top four!
Click to expand...

For me regardless of many folk the first season was good with certain players pulled in but had the foundations built by DM which RM eventually chucked out for tika taka.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top