It's cuckoo land stuff when you begin a post, once again, by accusing me of being someone else. For someone that professes to have superior insight of sources of knowledge, you continue to invent a make-believe person that you are strangely preoccupied with. Perhaps it's the same insecurity that gets you up at 5AM to have temper tantrums on here. Nevertheless, as I've said before, I read plenty of sources from all over the political spectrum and believe it is essential in life to be challenged and to continue to learn. I post stories here to challenge the lazy groupthink that I find. You can dismiss it and ridicule it all you like, but your failure to respond to any of the issues with a cogent argument or explanations reveals an insecurity about you. It's why you mock people, moan about sources and invent fictitious people. The reason you 'see no point in talking to me' and invent as many barriers and obstacles as possible to any dialogue is because you are afraid of being exposed. You have an irrational fear of weakness. You have an ego that is brittle and fragile. You view yourself as more intelligent and superior to others and are terrified this will be smashed to smithereens. I can promise you that I will expose your hypocrisy, your laziness and most of all your insecurities, but not to hurt you - it's to help you (and you need a lot of help)!
A few quick points:
1) It's a bit weird how you simply ignore the main points of
@Prevenger17 's post, which I've replicated below:
You think things like:
- January 6th was a friendly protest
- Trump won the election
- Zerohedge is a legitimate source of news
- Children should aspire to be someone who shot two people dead
- Tucker Carlson is a beacon of unbiased truth
Perhaps you could address these. Especially that all-important
pipe bomber (<--pretend I wrote that in bold to emphasize the laughable urgency you once claimed it to be) on January 5th, which if I recall correctly was
"the key to the whole case" as you suggested. As I pointed out to you, your obviously go-nowhere "pipe bomber" nonsense fell into an embarrassing web of non-logic when you simultaneously suggested this was some very deep state stuff (in which case they should never be found), yet also posted a link about how the FBI should be able to easily find this person because they can be geofenced. Which is it you clown: FBI can't find them, Deep State, or...wait for it...DEEP DEEP DEEP State...Bwa Ha ha ah? It's turtles all the way down with you. And as expected, like a distracted kitten, you dropped this topic only to pounce on the latest non-issue dangled in front of you by the social media algorithm to which you are addicted. I wonder what they will tell you to say next week?--don't answer that, no one actually cares you sad, lonely human.
2) For someone who is pathologically concerned with laptops, their content, deleted emails, hard-drives, and the recovery of deleted digital content etc., you
utilize your employer's laptop quite a bit for pushing weirdo right-wing conspiracy theories from some of the most fringe-element weirdo sites, such as gateway pundit, which is currently being sued for spreading misinformation and defamation. You might want to invest in your own hardware. Just a friendly suggestion.
3) Please make sure to not raise your son to be a vigilante killer. This is just weird, and your son deserves better. I'm serious about this (not a dig--it's really sad). You can still make a difference if you realize you've been played by an algorithm. As
@Prevenger17 has said, no one really cares if Hunter Biden (or Joe, for that matter) committed crimes. If they did, they should be charged, trialed, and judged accordingly. But your dogmatic inability to not see any other perspective except the one your algorithm tells you to be angry about is the very definition of a near-lost-cause. Don't pass this on to your kin.
4) You are taking a play from me by suggesting Prevenger17 needs help (see your last sentence quoted above), which is a common deflectionary tactic in child psychology, especially after I called you out for needing help regarding how you want to raise your son. You are running out of ideas and I can tell it stings you.
5) Remember how I smashed you again and again in terms of refuting your points and you got so frustrated you changed my original post to say
"I am in fact gay" only to be banned for this homophobic and childish maneuver? When you were allowed back you weirdly wrote the following:
I think my child is more mature than you are. He's 9.
In all the above, maybe give it a rest. You need professional help. I'm not kidding.