?FYP.
Fine young pannibals?
?FYP.
Excellentcontinually.
right on,Cognitive dissonance at its glorious best.
right on,
all Biden had to do was get to the capitol, stand outside and hold a bible upside down and trump supporters wouldn't have smashed up the place, pissed on the walls and waved confederate flags around in their auschwitz hoodies.
Except I haven't admitted I was wrong (and I am not). Finding someone with a gun doesn't make it an insurrection or traitorous. As you likely know the FBI involvement in this case is being suppressed and this information is not available to defendants at trial.Thank you for admitting that you were completely wrong about insurrectionists carrying guns onto Capitol grounds. And I didn't use hearsay, I used direct quotes from, Guy Reffitt, a convicted insurrectionist.
You wrote:
This is wrong under 18 USC 2383: Rebellion or insurrection, which states: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
And §2384 Seditious conspiracy states: If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
So you are wrong again, the threat of guns does not enter into these definitions.
Here is text and a screen shot of Jacob Chansley's (Minotaur man) plea deal, which he himself signed after admitting the following. So you are wrong again
As to the pipe bomber, the latest update from the FBI is here. And not finding one criminal out of many does not mean a crime wasn't committed. So your point is irrelevant.
![]()
Welcome to fbi.gov | Federal Bureau of Investigation
We protect the American people and uphold the US Constitution. You can report suspicious activities and crime by contacting us 24/7 at tips.fbi.gov.www.fbi.gov
Brutal come back
Think he’s concussed
Landon Copeland seems like a reliable witness tbf. I’m soldExcept I haven't admitted I was wrong (and I am not). Finding someone with a gun doesn't make it an insurrection or traitorous. As you likely know the FBI involvement in this case is being suppressed and this information is not available to defendants at trial.
Part of what you suggested is hearsay evidence. It is what one person is alleging and therefore another person can allege the opposite. The court has never considered or ruled on if what he alleged was true because it was immaterial to what was being charged.
On the same basis I can include the following evidence to dispute what you claim:
Gateway Pundit Interviews Jan 6 Antifa Whistleblower Landon Copeland from Prison – Claims 100+ Fellow Antifa Members Involved, Large Organized Planning Session of Hundreds on Jan. 5 (AUDIO)
Now, where's the pipe bomber? That's the key to this whole case. The person that allegedly tried to blow up the DNC and the RNC that nobody wants to talk about? You're suggesting the Feds can't find them and have made efforts to ascertain who he is? I'm suggesting that they don't want to find them... Nor do they want any investigation into law enforcement being directly involved in co-ordinating, facilitating and inciting a riot. These are the key questions everyone should want to know. That's federal tax dollars at work.
Now back to Joe Biden.
Small conflict of interest there.Landon Copeland seems like a reliable witness tbf. I’m sold
“To silence a major political candidate is profoundly undemocratic. Social media is the modern equivalent of the town square. How can democracy function if only some candidates have access to it?”Interesting… when we use our TeamKennedy email address to set up @instagram accounts we get an automatic 180-day ban. Can anyone guess why that’s happening? pic.twitter.com/0G8oRnoXTv
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 2, 2023
RFK Jr’s personal Instagram account was banned from the platform in February 2021, at the height of the coronavirus panic, for “repeatedly sharing debunked claims about the coronavirus or vaccines,” per a Facebook (now known as Meta) statement at the time.To silence a major political candidate is profoundly undemocratic. Social media is the modern equivalent of the town square. How can democracy function if only some candidates have access to it?
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 2, 2023
In response, Musk offered to host a discussion on Spaces, Twitter’s live audio broadcasting platform, with the candidate.Would you like to do a Spaces discussion with me next week?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 2, 2023
Written in the style of @dholliday. How strange.Zuck Loves Biden: Facebook Prevents RFK Jr. from Launching Instagram Campaign Account
Facebook-owned Instagram is preventing Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is competing with President Joe Biden in the Democrat primary, from setting up an official campaign account, according to the candidate.
In a post on Twitter, RFK Jr. said that his campaign account is being automatically banned when they attempt to set up a campaign account.
“When we use our TeamKennedy email address to set up Instagram accounts we get an automatic 180-day ban,” said the Democrat candidate on Twitter. “Can anyone guess why that’s happening?”
“To silence a major political candidate is profoundly undemocratic. Social media is the modern equivalent of the town square. How can democracy function if only some candidates have access to it?”
RFK Jr’s personal Instagram account was banned from the platform in February 2021, at the height of the coronavirus panic, for “repeatedly sharing debunked claims about the coronavirus or vaccines,” per a Facebook (now known as Meta) statement at the time.
In another tweet, the Democrat candidate thanked Twitter owner Elon Musk for allowing him and his campaign to “have a voice.”
In response, Musk offered to host a discussion on Spaces, Twitter’s live audio broadcasting platform, with the candidate.
![]()
The nephew of the 35th President, John F. Kennedy, RFK Jr. has become well known in recent years for challenging mainstream narratives about coronavirus and vaccines.
In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News last month, Kennedy slammed the establishment’s embrace of censorship, saying “we’re now in this situation where without free speech, democracy just withers and dies.”
“Free speech is the fertilizer; it’s the sunlight; it’s the water for democracy,” he continued. “There is no time in history where the people who were censoring speech were the good guys.
An economic populist and a critic of open borders, Kennedy has promised to use tariffs to protect American workers if elected President.
The Democrat candidate has also attacked the growing influence of Chinese investment in the American economy, focusing particularly on the communist nation’s purchases of farmland across the country.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.