You've changed your argument half way through though so maybe you need to be a bit more precise with your wording. You started off by saying that Branthwaite is the superior player full stop and now you've pivoted to saying that he is better than Stones was at the same stage of his career. That's a completely different argument. I think you're forgetting how highly rated Stones was when he was here. The best team in the land paid £47.5 for him 8 years ago.
On the contrary mate, you said the sample on Branthwaite was too small to draw a conclusion in a rebuttal to my earlier statement, so i adjusted the debate to offer you a like for like sample comparatively to illustrate my point.
Stones had huge potential here and was really talented, he had skills that made him uniuqe, he was prone to a mistake though - but you expect that from a player his age, but also you could see his class. As i say im not dissing Stones, hes a very good player. I just think Branthwaite could be a great player and i think hes better then Stones in his first year in our team. Both things can exist without it being Binary.
	
					
				
					
				
					
				
					
				
					
				







