2025/26 James Tarkowski

[heatmeiser]

I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously have a low tolerance of other people's opinions.

If you aren't a WUM - which would be incredible at this point - then you have the least amount of self-awareness I've ever seen.

It's genuinely hilarious that you have the balls to even post this

 

[Dad watched Dixie]

I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously have a low tolerance of other people's opinions.

 

[Hinchcliffe's Corner]

I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously have a low tolerance of other people's opinions.

On to ignore you go. You’re an absolute parody of yourself by this point.

Final straw. On to ignore you go.

Onto ignore you go.

No probs, I'll put you on ignore instead so I don't have to listen to your bleating.

I think that says more about you than it does about me. Onto ignore you go so I can converse with the adults.

Bored of you now. On to ignore.

 

[Nymzee]

I'm a lawyer it isn't.
Per Google AI
In English law, Assault is causing someone to fear immediate unlawful violence, with no physical contact needed (e.g., threatening to punch someone), while Battery is the actual unlawful physical application of force, even slight contact.

“I’m a lawyer but I need to use Google AI to define the word assault”

Seen it all now.

 

[DanB90]

It was pretty much attempted murder when you think about it.

 

[Benicetoourboys]

Still not convinced about you.

Maybe he's a Liverpool fan (can't help myself).

 

[heatmeiser]

“I’m a lawyer but I need to use Google AI to define the word assault”

Seen it all now.

At least Dave is believable.

This guy is just a laughing stock

 

[Kevsleftpeg]

“I’m a lawyer but I need to use Google AI to define the word assault”

Seen it all now.

Am I correct or not? Why is using an AI search engine to provide a definition invalid? Would I be more correct if I quoted the section of the statute? Jesus. Thick as mince.

 

[Kevsleftpeg]

At least Dave is believable.

This guy is just a laughing stock

And yet here you are.

 

[heatmeiser]

And yet here you are.

It isn't your thread...

Anyway, to quote yourself. "On ignore you go."

 

[Nymzee]

Am I correct or not? Why is using an AI search engine to provide a definition invalid? Would I be more correct if I quoted the section of the statute? Jesus. Thick as mince.

I had a look back, “apparently” you’re a financial lawyer, so unsure why you even brought it up, or do you often deal with people getting slapped by wads of £5 notes?

 

[Nymzee]

Is it Damo? Nah can’t be, Damo was better than this.

 

[COYBL25]

Is it Damo? Nah can’t be, Damo was better than this.

Damo is proud of being Damo.

His madness is his “ trademark “

 

[Kevsleftpeg]

It isn't your thread...

Anyway, to quote yourself. "On ignore you go."

Thanks, put me out of my misery.

 

[Kevsleftpeg]

I had a look back, “apparently” you’re a financial lawyer, so unsure why you even brought it up, or do you often deal with people getting slapped by wads of £5 notes?

Nice pivot. Apology accepted.