I really dont think moyes is the problem

[Del]

OH MY GOD!!!!

Yak demanded a 25% wage rise and Beckford was sold for £4 million which the board felt was too good. FFS.

Revisionist history there from the Owen Coyle in-ers.

So why was Cahill recalled after Ossie had played so well there last game?
Why did Saha start yet again after another terrible performance against Swansea?
Why did we start with 2 defenders as our center midfield?
Why did he take so long to make subs when we where crying out for changes?

 

[bluejock]

1. And every time Vellios has started he's struggled.

2. Barkley broke his leg last year. People wanting to play him every game now are rushing him and are frankly psychotic.

3. Owen Coyle's won about 2 games all season and has been spanked more than Chicoazul's mar this season.

1. So give him maybe half an hour to make a difference. Not 6 minutes.

2. How long does he need to be match fit? Again, he doesn't need to start every game, but when did he last get playing time?

3. Shut the [Poor language removed] up about Coyle. I've not mentioned him as a replacement once. I get that you don't like him, but don't mention him every post.

 

[Matt Damon]

More rubbish.

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT YOU JUST SAID.

It's about why, out of our squad, Moyes CHOSE to play 7 defensive players.

And as usual you're going on about Owen Coyle? and the board.

Also as usual you don't answer any questions directly, instead deflecting with random bizarre statements...

He's probably felt he didn't have a choice given that most of the attacking options we had have been sold, by the board and the kids are still learning their trade.

Owen Coyle's lot are £110 million in debt. And as I said have been spanked more than Chicoazul's mar this season. Yet some (RFUS) were calling for him in the summer FFS.

 

[Matt Damon]

1. So give him maybe half an hour to make a difference. Not 6 minutes.

2. How long does he need to be match fit? Again, he doesn't need to start every game, but when did he last get playing time?

3. Shut the [Poor language removed] up about Coyle. I've not mentioned him as a replacement once. I get that you don't like him, but don't mention him every post.

1. How long is a piece of string argument.

2. Perhaps Moyes wants him to have more time with the youth team/reserves etc work him up. He was thrown in early in the season and he did struggle defensively. Not that he will all the time. But just a little more time with them - will give him more confidence in the first team. I'd rather see a confident fit Barkley who's with it than someone burnt out because tits have been calling for him in too soon.

3. Owen Coyle.

 

[harry]

i don't know why people respond to damon, he says one thing then just repeats it all through the thread.

 

[Muggins]

Okay now we have some clarity.

You have a vendetta against Rufus.

You should have just said.

Onto the point you made about limited attacking options, we do have options but Moyes chooses not to use them.

By all means speculate as to why, but going on about Owen Coyle and the board is for another thread.

 

[bluejock]

1. How long is a piece of string argument.

2. Perhaps Moyes wants him to have more time with the youth team/reserves etc work him up. He was thrown in early in the season and he did struggle defensively.

3. Owen Coyle.

Because he's an attacking midfielder?

I'm going to agree to disagree, because it's pretty clear you won't be budged on Saha and Cahill's extraordinary goalscoring exploits and the tactical nous of a man who plays 7 defensive players in his starting 11.

I will however rep you for number 3 because I did a lulz you bad beast you

 

[Matt Damon]

Because he's an attacking midfielder?

I'm going to agree to disagree, because it's pretty clear you won't be budged on Saha and Cahill's extraordinary goalscoring exploits and the tactical nous of a man who plays 7 defensive players in his starting 11.

I will however rep you for number 3 because I did a lulz you bad beast you

1. No because he's only 18 and the side is struggling from "disposing of" 5 players in the summer god knows how many in the previous 12 months.

2. Cahill shouldn't be playing really. He's obviously not in form at all. It happens with players. Look at Rooney. He was struggling. For a good while till he found it again.

Saha should be running to the box not messing around and coming deep. He's the only striker. So defo needs to have a word there.

3. Seen it all before with this "moyes out" lot. If we actually had some money to spend £20million worth sold of attacking players with nothing to show for it.

What were people expecting.

 

[Matt Damon]

Okay now we have some clarity.

You have a vendetta against Rufus.

You should have just said.

Onto the point you made about limited attacking options, we do have options but Moyes chooses not to use them.

By all means speculate as to why, but going on about Owen Coyle and the board is for another thread.

But do we? Do we really?

half ready players are not options!

Those half ready players would be better had we had just some money to spend last summer. Since we'd have more options. Instead we have very few options!

We should have got two wingers in last summer. Plus a striker. Instead we got a winger on loan and an unproven striker on loan. Brilliant.

Who's faults that?

 

[meagher94]

Moyes has pi**ed me off too today. Having said that, it wasn't a game we should've went into with all guns blazing like some people are suggesting. We were away, it was Sunderlands job to come at us, not vice versa. And they have a new manager = surge of confidence.

Still though, PLAY BARKLEY FFS. Just for half an hour. He's better than McFadden.

 

[Muggins]

But do we? Do we really?

half ready players are not options!

Those half ready players would be better had we had just some money to spend last summer. Since we'd have more options. Instead we have very few options!

We should have got two wingers in last summer. Plus a striker. Instead we got a winger on loan and an unproven striker on loan. Brilliant.

Who's faults that?

So you're saying that's the team you would go with then? As we have no options you say.

If not, then we do have options and you've just proved yourself wrong.

If you would go with moyes team and decisions, then you're as clueless as Moyes.

 

[Matt Damon]

So you're saying that's the team you would go with then? As we have no options you say.

If not, then we do have options and live just proved yourself wrong.

If so then you're as clueless as Moyes.

No. I is saying that Cahill should be on the bench. I wouldn't have gone with Neville and Heitinga in the same team, however given our LIMITED options can understand it. Its not like Rodwell was available.


I'd of probably played Osman behind Saha. The problem is WE NEED THAT OTHER WINGER (in addition to Drenthe as was saying in the summer). Gueye's coming on but I want more consistency from him.

 

[meagher94]

Play the same team as last week only with Barkley instead of Fellaini and we edge a win today.

 

[Roztitute]

MOYES OUT

 

[Bigmaclad]

I think Damon was in a past relationship with Coyle, but they had to break it off because of the distances involved when Coyle moved to Bolton from Burnley. This left Damon very bitter and now he feels he has to point out Coyles failings, it helps him to get over the Scottish beaut.

He still loves him though, deep down.