Bob Elstone
Player Valuation: £35m
Brilliant last year.
this years he’s the ghost that walks.
this years he’s the ghost that walks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why play him if we're going to sell him. I'd rather bring someone in from the under 21's, at least they would have legs.Saw on the sky sports page apparently ancelotti has told him he’s being sold this month
anyone seen anything concrete?
He's stinks of China.Has anyone called Aston Villa yet?
CorrectHe's just not good enough.
Seen things here that he was "better" on Saturday. Should hope so! He's been a liability all season. In a team full of cowards, we have Sigurdsson and Schneiderlin in the spine of our team. They will go through great lengths to tell players where to pass provided its not to them.
Being terrified of the ball as our "creative" midfielder, is not a good combination. He hides, he's slow, he doesn't want to know, but disguises it with a decent goal every now and then. Garbage. Sell him in the summer when we get a chance and hopefully recoup something like £20m to someone who only reads stats.
. I hope he's been told that he isn't in the plans for next season and he ought to start looking at his next move.
Drop him first then!I agree he needs to go like but telling him he's not gonna be here is hardly gonna motivate him to perform better is it haha
Brilliant last year.
this years he’s the ghost that walks.
Definitely a lot more prolific last year but there were also a ton of matches in which he did nothing.Brilliant last year.
this years he’s the ghost that walks.
Even Martinez would have shuddered reading that.Never seen a worse take than that in my life.
Myth. He's the exact same player this season, only that he's got no goals to hide in
He's stinks of China.
This is funny. I‘m willing to indulge for a bit, so let‘s break it down. I admit I didn’t watch every Reading, Shrewsbury, Crewe, Hoffenheim, Spurs, Swansea, Iceland and Everton game he’s ever played in. But this is what I remember from reading up on him before he joined EFC.
And, in case you or anyone else misses it, the key point is this: just because a player *has played* in a position doesn’t mean it’s their position. Again, context matters.
In his career he’s played the majority of his games at attacking midfield. Ie the number 10 role (or arguably 8). This includes ‘second striker‘ because of the way he plays. Extremely rarely he’s played false nine when without a partner. All his clubs have recognised this, but most have struggled to put him in that position at some point for one reason or another. And Sigurdsson himself has said that’s his preferred position.
Left wing: He played some matches at left wing for Spurs, when they couldn’t fit him into the team, at Swansea for about half a season when he was largely supporting the striker from the left in attack then moving back in to make a compact 5, and at Everton in the Allardyce season. Out of all those, I’d say only Swansea is representative of him being played there in a settled structure. The rest were patchwork or experimentation, a lot like his position right now. The proof of that is that the experiments didn’t last very long, despite him ‘doing a job’. And at Spurs, he himself put the ‘failure’ down to being played out of position.
Central midfield: rarely, if ever. The fact that you‘re harking back to a period ten years ago, in the Championship, says it all.
I’m sure some appearance stats website will have this detail for you.
But the funny thing is, all that is completely irrelevant; my points being quite simple: 1) central midfield in a two at a team aiming for Europe is not his position — i.e. he is out of position — but he’s doing an OK job as cover while we have injuries. 2) The tactics need to acknowledge that, by not playing through him and whoever his partner is, if we do want to play with him in a two. 3) And as fans, we should recognise the context, lay off him, and put the negative energy into supporting someone else positively.
It’s not too hard to understand that that’s a *completely different thing* to discussing his long-term future at the club and whether he should be built around (the answer clearly being ‘no’). Give it a go.
He should be played behind the striker (he's crap) he's being played out of position, he should be played deeper (he's crap) he's being played out of position,,...…..