We already have it with the Champions League, especially with the forthcoming changes that make it a league competition followed by a knockout competition, making it near identical to this latest ESL proposal.
This ESL is not about facilitating competition between European Clubs, it’s about certain clubs wanting to circumvent UEFA so that they can become the rule makers and the revenue distributors.
I think it’s really arrogant of the elite clubs to think the rest of the football world is going to be on board with this. They are expecting the rest of the football world to agree to a set of rules that sets them up for life and leaves everyone else fighting for crumbs.
The rest of the footballing world isn’t going to agree to that.
No, I'm talking about a European League of, say, 36 matches. A full European "domestic" league. I don't think it's going to happen in the next decade, but that is the direction of travel as the EU single market dictates as much (because right now great clubs like Ajax or Benfica are essentially hemmed in by national borders in terms of TV despite being in a single market). The idea that Burnley should be able to make more money than those clubs simply because of geographical accident makes no sense. A pan-European league is a most meritocratic solution. What it lacks, however, is the local derby value and local rivalries of domestic leagues. In that sense, I'm not in favour. What we need, therefore, is a governing body that can keep all stakeholders onside if we want to preserve domestic national leagues (which would be the preferable state).
In the end, this may be a ruse to glean even more concessions from UEFA. If Perez at Real Madrid and the other charlatans who want permanent membership of the Big Cup get that, they'll be happy enough to remain under UEFA auspices. I can see that being the outcome of this (with added Saudi input providing even more money).
Either way, the whole thing has become a business - and a very dirty one at that.