He dictates how we have to play but in a bad way. His mobility is so bad that he cannot play holding mid by himself. So if he is invaluable to the team then we are stuck with playing two holding midfielders. My issue is that he's not good enough with the ball at his feet to indulge him playing just that position. If he was a Pirlo type then yes, but McCarthy and Cleverley work like dogs getting the ball back to get Barry on it in space then....a sideways pass to a full back.
I'd much rather see Cleverley and Barkley in the middle especially at home. Our defensive record is not great either so as holding mids him and McCarthy are missing something.
I never understand this 'we don't need 2 holding midfielders' argument.
We play that way because everyone apart from our goalkeeper and one centre half (Jagielka) is encouraged to be attacking and playing almost kamikazee like.
Look at the starting positions when we have a goal kick. Full-backs as wingers, CB's split with Stones actively told to bring the ball out. Tell me mate, without 2 holding midfielders do you expect us to a) keep possession b) win the ball back if we lose it?
Second point. it doesn't matter who you are, if you have one holding midfielder the ball WILL be played around you with ease against the top teams. Who's the best holding mid in the league? Matic? Silva and Co made him look absolute gammon last weekend. We have two and manage to by and large snuff them out.
As for your concerns over his distribution, I just don't get it mate. How many times did he manage to wriggle us out of a tight spot yesterday when the vultures surrounded him. Answer: many. He doesn't get flustered under pressure, knows when to play a longer pass (which he does frequently) and knows when the game needs shortening.
Sorry mate, I just don't understand how you can't see it.