I know this is very different to the books but I assume Daenerys going mad was mapped out by GRRM just strangely executed
Agree. Dont have a problem with her following her fathers footsteps but as has been pointed out, to go from angry to genocidal in a flash was in poor taste. This is the character who saved thousands of innocents, freed slaves and chained her dragons up for killing a kid, then goes and kills all those people after the surrender?
We should have seen the slow progression over years.
Do people not think that losing your 'child' and best friend, being betrayed by the people you trust and rejected by the person you love in the space of a couple of weeks could make you snap and live up to what people have said you will do by going mad? And surely going mad with an immense amount of power behind you would only go one way. Ir didnt need a long time to build up, when people can snap and break quickly, happens in real life all the time to people.
Yes but the laying waste to kings landing after the surrender was out of character. If the bells had not been rung then it would be more believable but she could have flew straight to the red keep and burned it down. Innocent people would have died but its understandable.
I didnt like the whole Bronn scenario either.
Last edited:
