Arteta started from a far higher position and was able to spend far larger amounts on individual players.
It would be stupidity not to hold onto Lampard for the next couple of seasons at least to give him a fighting chance.
We could play the same long ball style as your namesake Egil Olsen, Allardyce or have Moyes...not sure what they could do with Maupay up top and Gray selfishly playing for himself.
The point with Arteta was that he and the club immediately knew which direction to go (concept). Playing style, investing in younger players, etc. At the same time, we chose Ancelotti, which meant investing in short-term solutions and a pragmatic playing style. I miss this clarity from Lampard.
Aren't we at the top of the statistics when it comes to long balls?
Egil Olsen's postulates are quite simple: If the opposing team is in balance, then we take minimal risk (long ball), and aim to win the ball back in favorable areas. If the opposing team is slightly off balance, the ball must move quickly in a longitudinal direction, and we must finish the attack as quickly as possible. So it is the balance of the opponents' defense that decides our tactics. In defence, you have a pure zonal defence, pressure, cover and balance, and we want to lead the opponent into the center of the pitch, because here it is advantageous to win the ball. The first defender should try to tackle as much as possible, as long as you have cover.
What does Lampard want? Apart from long balls?