Of course it is. The original article makes it sound like the club were in a precarious position regarding Finch Farm, when that's not the reality.
If the company that owned FF went into liquidation has nothing whatsoever to do with EFC, the Echo's interpretation of the law after that happened is down to the Echo and again nothing to do with EFC.
I find it amusing that club officials can deduce what the thought process of two companies re garding land ownership is but cannot get the story right regarding its 'own land' at Everton Place. You cant make it up!
