Think you’re slightly going over the top there.
Fulham came up, spent 100mil went down. Newcastle spent 100mil the season they went down. Villa spent money went down.
How many of them went into administration?
Yes if we went down we’d sell a lot of players and probably cheaper than we’d like. So we’d raise 200mil plus and save 50/60mil in wages, while having parachute payments
I'm not going slightly over the top. You're comparing apples and oranges when talking about spends other clubs made, they weren't sustaining consistent levels of losses like Everton because they haven't given out £100k a week to every Tom, Dick and Harry. Our accounts are in the public domain and they're terrible NOW. We're already losing over £100m a year because we have huge salary expenses and commercial revenue that doesn't cover it. We've just lost our favourable sponsorship deals because of the sanctions on Usmanov. If the worst happens and we are relegated, we will lose the TV money and we will have to sell almost all of our decent players for cut-price fees. Even if we do not go down this season, we are going to have to sell DCL and Richarlison to hold off the eyewatering losses and finance the signings of a few players.
Personally I don't see how we're going to raise £200m for the players we have if we're relegated. We would have no bargaining power at all, the likes of Richarlison and DCL would be sold for smaller fees than they normally woud be, a relegated club isn't getting £50-70m per player. We've just sold one of the best left backs in the league for £25m in January. If we are relegated, forget it, we'll be getting £40m each for the likes of DCL and Richarlison.
It's imperative we stay up, it really can't be overstated how much of a disaster relegation would be for us.