Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 110 7.8%

  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,298 92.2%
  • Total voters
    1,408
Status
Not open for further replies.

msb said:
Erm

Stadium on the way - check
Decent manager - check
Youth players a chance - check
Top money for players out - check
Some shrewd acquisitions - check (also some dross as have Spurs - check)

And Levy isn't the money or the owner, he's the face of the owner.
Click to expand...

He runs it on a day to day basis and is the business partner of the fella that owns ENIC if I remember correctly. I wouldn't put them in the category of poorly run clubs that you suggested.
 
msb said:
and being honest, to some of those above us. Kronke? RS owners? Spurs? State sponsored by a country that promotes religious war (Citeh)? And a team that are mortgaged up to the hilt, but have a large enough fan base, being milked at every opportunity to fund it (Urinated)?
Click to expand...

I'd love owners like Spurs have. They are the model for how to run a competitive Premier League team in my opinion.
 

Bungle said:
He runs it on a day to day basis and is the business partner of the fella that owns ENIC if I remember correctly. I wouldn't put them in the category of poorly run clubs that you suggested.
Click to expand...

Sorry, you mis-interpret my intention. I don't think Spurs are poorly run, I just don't think their owner (partners?) are any better than what we have. I am not certain that any of the clubs I mention are poorly run, I just would not be comfortable being owned by their owners.
 
msb said:
Sorry, you mis-interpret my intention. I don't think Spurs are poorly run, I just don't think their owner (partners?) are any better than what we have. I am not certain that any of the clubs I mention are poorly run, I just would not be comfortable being owned by their owners.
Click to expand...

I guess that's a slightly different point that maybe I missed a bit. I'm not comfortable with the whole 49% thing Moshiri has going on, I'm sure there are reasons for it that make sense but I'm not smart enough to begin to pretend I understand them. I'd feel much happier if he took full ownership and booted out Kenwright and Elstone. I appreciate Kenwright has been credited with having a big impact on a few of our signings, but he just screams small time and I've no idea why he is still hanging around.
 
micknick said:
Are you being serious mate?
Click to expand...
No , think he could do with putting a bit more of his own stamp on the club, starting with whoever is a fault for the transfer policy , not the money spent no problems there really just the over all strategy, to many midfielder players , not enough at the back or up front.
He is better than Kenwright behind the scenes for the club, actually might see a ground built with him.
wish he would get rid of the old guard as the feeling that some things are just the same will just linger on, till he does.
 

edge said:
No , think he could do with putting a bit more of his own stamp on the club, starting with whoever is a fault for the transfer policy , not the money spent no problems there really just the over all strategy, to many midfielder players , not enough at the back or up front.
He is better than Kenwright behind the scenes for the club, actually might see a ground built with him.
wish he would get rid of the old guard as the feeling that some things are just the same will just linger on, till he does.
Click to expand...

Im not making excuses but maybe reasons- this has to have been the craziest trasfer window ever and although we obviously have more cash there isnt an endless supply. I actually think that that potentially other signings hinged on some players leaving- £10m for Niasse and £35m for Barkley would have armed us with some funds to buy other players.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top