A double negative is a positive so I think he means we will spend.I give up. What does that mean? ?
A double negative is a positive so I think he means we will spend.I give up. What does that mean? ?
Not really. They'd probably pay more than what we got for richarlison. I'd take martial and then go and sign another young striker.Anyone else a little concerned United might come in for Dom if Ronaldo leaves…
From Deep Space Nine?…..apparently in talks to sign Benjamin Sesko.
To be fair, it was the only favourable stats they had.At least we appear to be looking at players track records regarding appearances and injuries now,well regarding the two Burnley lads anyway.
Yeah we’ve already sold the family silver, so to speak, this summer in Richarlison. Although I imagine all our players are available at the right price, we can probably afford to hold out for a higher price now than we might otherwise have had to accept. Plus not sure Ten Hag would have the same views on DCL as Ole, who seemed to be a big fan.Not really. They'd probably pay more than what we got for richarlison. I'd take martial and then go and sign another young striker.
Would have to take a serious offer now to lose our main striker a week before the season, and the number almost goes up daily. That said, if the number is enough to get both of, say, Broja and Terrier then we’d have to consider it.Yeah we’ve already sold the family silver, so to speak, this summer in Richarlison. Although I imagine all our players are available at the right price, we can probably afford to hold out for a higher price now than we might otherwise have had to accept. Plus not sure Ten Hag would have the same views on DCL as Ole, who seemed to be a big fan.
We've gone to the dogsWould have to take a serious offer now to lose our main striker a week before the season, and the number almost goes up daily. That said, if the number is enough to get both of, say, Broja and Terrier then we’d have to consider it.
By the sounds of it we’d be looking at about £80million plus to get the two of them. Although Chelsea might reduce the asking price for Broja if they get another striker in.Would have to take a serious offer now to lose our main striker a week before the season, and the number almost goes up daily. That said, if the number is enough to get both of, say, Broja and Terrier then we’d have to consider it.
Broja and terrier, 80mil? No chance!By the sounds of it we’d be looking at about £80million plus to get the two of them. Although Chelsea might reduce the asking price for Broja if they get another striker in.
Its you're opinion their is hardly nothing we can't spend? We'll I surpose that makes sence.It means we will hardly spend nothing.
Already better than Rondon and would play him on the bench…..apparently in talks to sign Benjamin Sesko.
Dont do it Atalanta. Hes just going to disappoint.
Maybe, just going by what I’ve been reading in the media. Talk of Chelsea wanting £50mill for Broja and Rennes wanting £30m for Terrier. If we could get the two for 50-60 then that would be decent business.Broja and terrier, 80mil? No chance!
50-60m would get both.
If this is true then I'd be pretty annoyed if we are even considering him as an option. He's a £20m player at most, and has only performed well at this level for about 3 months.Maybe, just going by what I’ve been reading in the media. Talk of Chelsea wanting £50mill for Broja and Rennes wanting £30m for Terrier. If we could get the two for 50-60 then that would be decent business.