I'm right, he was offside and useless.
No ya not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'm right, he was offside and useless.
If there was any consistency to VAR decisions (HAHAHAHAHAHA) then if the goal is disallowed then it should be brought back for a penalty on Sigurdsson.
If they can disallow goals in other games for a foul that happened in the build up on the opposite end of the pitch, then continuity dictates we should have had a pen.
Incompetent arseholes.
Is the right answer. Var isn't the problem it's the arrogant shoitehawks that interpretate the rules badly.Refereeing in this country is the problem. Absolute clownery.
You just can't say he's interfering with play unless you're going to also say that for about 50 other scenarios where it is never officiated that way.Sigurdsson had a largely poor game but offside he was not, as he was not interfering with the game, unless you take the word of De Gea who is hardly unbiased, yet rushed across to influence the officials.
The ref made the correct decision and gave the goal it was fat arse Moss that overturned it.HAVE to mic up the conversation for it. The ref noticeably didn’t have a clue what was going on there.
Dermot Gallagher no surprise supposedly said VAR was right , with michael owen telling D/G he was wrong , that WAS via premier league tv-bt i dont know as didnt watch that channel today
As he usually does on pretty much every decision, bar the very very rare oneHe'll be defending his mates on sky sports tomorrow. I don't think he's said we've been hard done by on any decisions
Yep,rather they get it wrong by themselves, than get it wrong using VAR ,which sounds wrong either wayI know it's killing the game, wish they would just bin it and get back to just the match ref's cheating instead of some ****** 200 miles away.