Whilst I agree the norm is short tenures, the total rebuilding job that Martinez and Bill signed up is more than a three year plan, surely? There is no way it's anything less than a 5 year plan. If I was given 5 years to have a final version ready, judging me on a select few parameters after 2 2/3 seems unfair, but that might be me.
In any event...
I totally understand that the main indicator of a sides ability to win games is the league table but surely you concede that the previous financial model would mean slow progress?
Buy young/inexperienced, raw players, develop them, selling them, reinvesting. We've seen its taken 3 years to develop Rom, just one player. It's a very slow progression when you've no money or are using sales to generate money
And its been a point of many debate, agreeing to disagree is obviously fine, but I cant understand how progression cannot be seen.
Barkley?
Stones?
Lukaku?
Deulofeu?
Funes Mori?
All visibly progessing as the season(s) have progressed.
2 cup semi finals? When was the last time we did that? Surely that's progression?
The big test for RM is this summer. We've now just a few spots left to fill and bolster - GK, CB, CF. He has to get them playing consistently and the pressure increases because of the new financial model. What hasn't been said is that the new financial model allows him to bring in experienced, proven winners who can chaperone these younger, inexperienced players on the pitch.
I love Jags, Baines, Coleman... But they've won nothing. We need players who have won titles, and we'll finally be able to bring those players in this summer.
If he brings those players in this summer and by Christmas he's floundering then get shut. Until then, for me and others, he deserves a chance to continue the progression albeit on a shorter leash.
I think this is a fair post, and I appreciate the tone of the response - we should all be able to disagree without resorting to characterisation of the poster.
As I've said on many occasions, going back to May last year when I first suggested Martinez should go, he does possess skills and qualities, it would be churlish in the extreme to suggest he doesn't. He has a good eye for a player and without doubt several players have developed under his tutelage.
My contention has always been though that he does not possess all the qualities and skills necessary to take us where we aspire and frankly ought to be given what he has at his disposal.
As stated previously his weaknesses in my opinion are defence, tactical naivety, an inability to change the course of a game when the opposition are on the front foot, and an inability to create the positive mind set and mental strength in players that is required in a truly competitive side.
The results of his failings manifest themselves in performances and results on the pitch (as evidenced in the last two seasons), unequal and irregular progression of individuals, a lack of mental strength on the pitch, and I'm afraid to say an environment which encourages our best players to look elsewhere and inevitably impact our ability to recruit the very best going forward.
Thus Martinez represents a very high risk strategy moving forward if Everton are to fulfill their ambitions, match their potential and actually progress in a very competitive environment which can only get more competitive in the future as a result of the enormous amount of money in the PL.
Therefore there is only one option available to the Board at the end of the season. Recruit a proven management team with experience of winning, European experience and handling the highest profile players in the business.
That may seem harsh, it may not be viewed as the "Everton" way (although few were as ruthless as John Moores when necessary) but with the amount of capital invested and to be invested, and the potential rewards and opportunities there really is no option.