Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
your words-
It’s a shame you don’t use Google more mate, you might actually find some facts to support your position.....
so i use it and your still unhappy....
That's my point you can google anything and come up with good stuff or rubbish like I posted....

So you’ve somehow proved the internet is not a source of any actual factual information because you can find the S*n on it?

Absolute gold lol
 
Yesterday I bought three beers, that is a fact. Today I intend to buy three beers, that is a forecast or a projection, but it is not a fact as I may actually buy two or four. I have no problem with people showing me forecasts or projections, but call them forecasts or projections, do not call them facts....
If you forecast 3 pints and your actual ends up being 12 then you might have had a point...

The OBR figures covered a band btw......
 
So Pete, you dismiss things from the OBR, but seem happy to swallow May's statement that an as yet unidentified 'Brexit dividend' will be available to spend on the NHS? Projections are fine so long as it suits your argument?

Where have I said that I accept May’s statement as fact. It is an intention, made up of amounts of money drawn from differing government accounts. I have no knowledge of exactly how much will come from which particular bucket, and neither do you. I did not dismiss the OBR, merely dismissed FLHD’s assertion of its data as fact, when it patently isn’t, even the words that they use in the charts and in their text say it isn’t.....So once again, I have no problem with facts, but don’t call projections or forecasts facts when they aren’t........use the correct term......
 
Where have I said that I accept May’s statement as fact. It is an intention, made up of amounts of money drawn from differing government accounts. I have no knowledge of exactly how much will come from which particular bucket, and neither do you. I did not dismiss the OBR, merely dismissed FLHD’s assertion of its data as fact, when it patently isn’t, even the words that they use in the charts and in their text say it isn’t.....So once again, I have no problem with facts, but don’t call projections or forecasts facts when they aren’t........use the correct term......
So you reckon the divorce bill will be less than £37BN then?
 
But you're only supposed to quote reputable sources. Above paper is very low on the reliability index of British newspapers. Most newspapers have a bias (left/right etc...), but preferably only quote those that at least have the facts rights. Never mind what they do with the interpretation. Same can be said for studies from universities etc...
My point exactly depends on the title you put in Google to win an argument etc Bruce and I joke about it or I take him on that point....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top