zzr45
#MURDERINGSCUM
Eh, if it was being taken to an a MP or being used as a mandate to campaign as the document states, I wouldn't see it being taken as a particularly well put together argument for that level.Your wording is peculiar.
The intent of the survey was to gauge support for safe standing - based on the relatively small sample size and the modest aims of the survey I'd say it was successful.
It wasn't intended to be a dissertation FFS.
If I was the MP that this was taken to I'd even want to see real basics - could it be argued that it's based mainly on the nostalgia of people who went to the grounds in the 70s & 80s and might actually put off the next generation of fans. Where's the evidence that standing tickets are actually cheaper etc, etc. Why do 36% of people think that standing would reduce conflict with stewards and police - arguably isn't that a very dangerous justification?
The aims laid out within the study, to use it as a platform for discussion, are completely missed. It says something, but I could ask 10 mates and give you the same sort of answers.