So apparently we were "supposed to win" at Sunderland - is that something to do with them being at the bottom end of the table last season? OK I get that but, wait a minute.. promoted Middlesbrough were supposed to win there too? Burnley get nil point for beating Liverpool? Hull over Leicester?
What kind of fd up brain can possible argue that beating the Champions (when the team is just promoted) isn't a "positive" result?
Irrelevant. As we do not exist in their comparison graph it doesn't matter.......it's very simple.....
"Quote from: Dpt1983 on Yesterday at 12:29:17 AM
Really don't understand this concept?? Anyone care to put into laymans terms?
Each game has a "par score" of either 1 or 3.
- For away games against the teams who finished in the top 12 places last season "par" equals 1.
- For all home games and the remaining 7 away games "par" equals 3.
If you win a par 1 game you get +2 points in the APLT. (3 points for a win - 1 point for par = 2 points)
If you draw a par 1 game you get 0 points in the APLT. (1 point for draw - 1 point for par = 1 point)
If you lose a par 1 game you get -1 points in the APLT. ""
If you win a par 3 game you get 0 points in the APLT. ""
If you draw a par 3 game you get -2 points in the APLT. ""
If you lose a par 3 game you get -3 points in the APLT. ""
By "playing to par" you will stay on 0 points in the APLT. Over the course of a full season this is the same as getting 90 points in the real table (19 home wins * 3 points + 7 away wins * 3 points + 12 away draws * 1 point).
The idea is that by applying a "par score" for each game you take into account the difficulty of the fixtures (based on where each team placed the previous season), something which the actual table doesn't. This means that e.g. teamA might be a few points behind teamB in the real table after XX amount of games, but because of a much easier set of fixtures remaining teamA is still favorite to finish above teamB in the end."