ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
Status
Not open for further replies.
The very same RS beauts ranting on about losing to City and their 'dirty oil money signings' seem completely oblivious to the fact they had a £32m striker sat on their bench the entire game.

£32m.

The amount of money that lot have blown over the last few years is utterly shocking, yet the RAWKite stance is that they are somehow morally superior to the likes of City and Chelsea and are fighting a gallant fight against teams with huge amounts of money. Well newsflash fellas....you aren't. You're just laughingly incapable of spending yours properly.
 
Raino85 said:
Milner was still left to take one too. Very strange decision on some of the takers.
Plus his subs yesterday were mad took moreno off when he was having a good game.
And also when he needed to get a goal took Firminho off but still left Can, Milner & Heenderson on the pitch
Click to expand...

....Carragher was very controversial in his condemnation of Moreno. He might have overstepped the mark when he said the LB needs to be replaced and was very much to blame for the City goal. Ironically, he said Flanagan should play there who I think is his relation. Redknapp asked why you would want to play a RB at LB.
 
Eggs said:
....Carragher was very controversial in his condemnation of Moreno. He might have overstepped the mark when he said the LB needs to be replaced and was very much to blame for the City goal. Ironically, he said Flanagan should play there who I think is his relation. Redknapp asked why you would want to play a RB at LB.
Click to expand...

moreno stunk wembley out. am embarrassing dive totry and win a pen, schoolboy defending by sticking a leg out in the area and then finally got booked after his man (fernandinho the well known winger) had got the better of him all game. the amount of times city broke into a massive left back sized hole was hilarious, don't even need to say where the goal came from.

he's alright going forward, but he's supposed to be a defender, there's not much worse defenders in the league at the moment.
 
Funny thing is, even though we could now just click our fingers and demand any of their players, I don't think I'd have any of them.

They properly bottled it last night, and I don't want that sour turd of a mentality to ruin the gold-edged infinity pool that is Everton.
 
ah right

suOXWfr.jpg
 
Ashtonian said:
Guarantee you Liverpool fans will talk about the game on wednesday as the start of their new rivalry with city.

you know like the Chelsea one, for no reason whatsoever other than them thinking they are still title contenders,

It baffles me really, they invent rivalries with every successful team in the league despite not competing with them whatsoever. Next season it will be the Leicester Liverpool rivalry.
Click to expand...

It was the same when their media mob started talking about games with Utd as the Derby......they can't help themselves....one of the few bits of sense ever spoken by Kenny was when he said that there was only one Derby and that was against Everton..........they'll change their tune again when our investment kicks in......
 
peteblue said:
It was the same when their media mob started talking about games with Utd as the Derby......they can't help themselves....one of the few bits of sense ever spoken by Kenny was when he said that there was only one Derby and that was against Everton..........they'll change their tune again when our investment kicks in......
Click to expand...
see i get the united one but its the chelsea/city/newcastle type rivalries i don't understand. 10 years ago Liverpool still weren't winning leagues, chelsea only just took over, city probably relegated and because they have surpassed them they suddenly form the rivalry in their own heads.

Realistically they dont give them a seconds thought other than to laugh at them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top