ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[PhilM]

Don't see why not - the shoite paid something like £20m for markovic, didn't they? *guffaws*

Most clubs don't 'indulge' to the same extent as those lot as they're not as stupid. Their benchmarks aren't the typical!

 

[hallamblue]

Caulker and now Robert Green. And to think they criticised Hodgson's recruitment!!

 

[AndyC]

Their benchmarks aren't the typical!

Skidmarks more like, and I don't mean those made by tyres !!

 

[Jacko93]

No wonder Mingolet signed a new long term contract if Green and Bogdan will be his main competition.

 

[ToffeeDan]

Have they really signed Green?

Not another £10M wasted - surely not.

 

[dandydan]

Caulker and now Robert Green. And to think they criticised Hodgson's recruitment!!

If Woy made those signings now he'd be lucky to leave Anfield alive.

 

[Blue 1]

Have they really signed Green?

Not another £10M wasted - surely not.

Say what now?

TROLOLOLOLOL

Robert 'effin Green? Srsly?

 

[Whistlin' Dixie]

Most clubs don't 'indulge' to the same extent as those lot as they're not as stupid. Their benchmarks aren't the typical!

True enough. Plus the media don't seem to do us many favours with their valuations of our players.

 

[PhilM]

Have they really signed Green?

Not another £10M wasted - surely not.

A deal is imminent according to the Independent. Not sure where the £10m has come from though as they only mention £12m for Long.

 

[Donald Twain]

Don't see why not - the shoite paid something like £20m for markovic, didn't they? *guffaws*

Do people still 'guffaw' these days?

 

[peteblue]

Do people still 'guffaw' these days?

Only at the RS.......

 

[Khalekan]

& 18 Million for Sakho !!

And wasn't it £32 million for Firmino?

 

[Khalekan]

Curiouser, curiouser and funnier.


http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spor...s-klopp-says-10757713#rlabs=1 rt$category p$4




Liverpool FC transfers: Klopp says he will have final say on all deals, except maybe Zlatan Ibrahimovic!

 

[Pilks]

Does ANYBODY understand this gibberish about Sturridge on RAWK...?

I'm lost, even by their standards...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Brundish over on anfield index podcasts is the only person I've come across giving any insight into Daniel's injury woes.

They calculate 3 week averages for fitness. Go significantly above that and you WILL, as an athlete, get injured. Not just Daniel Sturridge, any athlete.

Sturridge is such a good player that he's always been "rushed" back too quickly without building up his three week average fitness. (A lengthy spell of treatment under misdiagnosis and conditioning by dinosaurs such as hodgson didn't help).

Klopp is trying to get off the Merry go round of injury-return-injury. If he can build up Sturridge's three week average then we'll have the signing of the season (just like 13/14).

Only time will tell...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[toffeejack]

not a clue @Pilks.

sturridge doesn't get rushed back because he's good. He gets rushed back because he plays for an incompetant club - the same club that saw torres, one of the finest strikers in europe run into the group and was finished before he got to 30, the same team than did the same to gerrard who saw him finished by 31. The same team who would have done the same to sterling if he hadn't have got out of there. His career would have been effectively over by the time he was 27/28 through total burnout.