ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.
The furore winding them up on RAWK over Klopp's upset at the fans walk out after the Palace goal has led to them even put photos up of him staring at them leaving. Apparently the departures also included fans who he high fived after the equaliser. One of their cult did try to inject some sanity to the proceedings however by referring to the lack of atmosphere and noise from their legendary supporters and suggested that.......
Re: Liverpool 1-2 Crystal Palace - post match discussion
« Reply #576 on: Yesterday at 07:09:10 PM »

It would be pretty easy to install mics into the seats and create a noise map after each match. That would make it easy to address the quiet sectors.

Presumably, with the mics in the seats, they would have to sing out of their arses to achieve amplification. Could make a novel change from them persistently talking out of them anyway.
Ha Ha....maybe at the next home game there will be machine gun nests at the 4 corners of the pitch...
 
I see Klopps complaining about the fans leaving after the second goal, does he not know they all have planes to catch.......

2E3F37B100000578-3309492-image-a-47_1447014925371.jpg


2E3F6A7900000578-0-image-a-28_1447014059091.jpg
Is this a wheres wally competition ? Im going for the big fat get on the right with the red jacket and a Stan Boardman syrup
 
Spion Kop 1906 ‏@SpionKop1906 3h3 hours ago
No flags in solidarity with those who've tried to keep traditions alive with no support from @LFC. Again.


That's the line from these inbred, sister fingering wools.

I suppose they're right in that the thug was trying to keep their traditions alive by acting in a violent and aggressive manner towards someone who can't defend themselves.
Perhaps the flag waver was trying to protect his fellow fans from having to watch the sh*te on the pitch...........
 
See that solicitor who called them Scouse scum has been sacked .

What grounds? Sometimes I despair for the state of mankind. Yes he insulted Scouse people, yes he's a corporate lawyer but, wtf, we live in such politically correct times that people get hounded for being a bit of an ass - in his own time. Someone else takes it upon themselves to out him (by saying who he is and what he does) and, bingo, the baying crowd have their blood.. PATHETIC.
 
What grounds? Sometimes I despair for the state of mankind. Yes he insulted Scouse people, yes he's a corporate lawyer but, wtf, we live in such politically correct times that people get hounded for being a bit of an ass - in his own time. Someone else takes it upon themselves to out him (by saying who he is and what he does) and, bingo, the baying crowd have their blood.. PATHETIC.

"freedom of speech" in 100 years there'll be no such thing as jokes because you'll get arrested for everyone.
 
What grounds? Sometimes I despair for the state of mankind. Yes he insulted Scouse people, yes he's a corporate lawyer but, wtf, we live in such politically correct times that people get hounded for being a bit of an ass - in his own time. Someone else takes it upon themselves to out him (by saying who he is and what he does) and, bingo, the baying crowd have their blood.. PATHETIC.

Apparently he's got such an important job that he can't say anything in public that might offend otherwise it's okay to give him the bullet because he might have upset potential clients and can't be trusted around present clients, even though he's a partner of the firm and has industry awards for being the best in the business and great at his job as long as you keep him off the subject of football.

@catcherintherye can no doubt fill you in with details about how important people in today's society should behave and the consequences of falling short to his draconian and patronising rules on modern society.

It won't be a short post though..
 
Apparently he's got such an important job that he can't say anything in public that might offend otherwise it's okay to give him the bullet because he might have upset potential clients and can't be trusted around present clients, even though he's a partner of the firm and has industry awards for being the best in the business and great at his job as long as you keep him off the subject of football.

@catcherintherye can no doubt fill you in with details about how important people in today's society should behave and the consequences of falling short to his draconian and patronising rules on modern society.

It won't be a short post though..

I'm afraid writing in a concise manner is a great weakness of mine! I will try though. :) .

You keep trying to make this out as societal pressures. As I keep trying to point out, whatever societal standards are on this have little importance. How I think important people should act is also irrelevant. If I think he should call scouser scum, or shouldn't call scouser scum makes not one jot of difference.

By patronising rules of modern society, what you really mean are stifling rules within the executive edge of the business community. You don't seem to have comprehended yet that it was a private business that have moved him on.

If I owned a huge law company and one of my top execs behaved like that I'd probably move them on too. Maybe you would keep them? Neither of us in all likelihood will ever know because we don't run such a company. The idea though that he's been moved on due to societal pressures is just not the case.
 
I'm afraid writing in a concise manner is a great weakness of mine! I will try though. :) .

You keep trying to make this out as societal pressures. As I keep trying to point out, whatever societal standards are on this have little importance. How I think important people should act is also irrelevant. If I think he should call scouser scum, or shouldn't call scouser scum makes not one jot of difference.

By patronising rules of modern society, what you really mean are stifling rules within the executive edge of the business community. You don't seem to have comprehended yet that it was a private business that have moved him on.

If I owned a huge law company and one of my top execs behaved like that I'd probably move them on too. Maybe you would keep them? Neither of us in all likelihood will ever know because we don't run such a company. The idea though that he's been moved on due to societal pressures is just not the case.

Tl;Dr.
 
What grounds? Sometimes I despair for the state of mankind. Yes he insulted Scouse people, yes he's a corporate lawyer but, wtf, we live in such politically correct times that people get hounded for being a bit of an ass - in his own time. Someone else takes it upon themselves to out him (by saying who he is and what he does) and, bingo, the baying crowd have their blood.. PATHETIC.

What baying crowd? And he outed himself by going onto a TV channel and acting like a knob. It made no difference what any alleged baying mob did, he put it on a public forum.

As for political correctness the legal firm haven't fired him for being un pc. They have fired him because he's shown himself to be a liability given the nature of the work he does. If I ran such a business I'd be worried how he'd respond to an opposing Lawyer, especially as our legal system is adverserial.

In essence he has let a few idiot supporters singing "sacked in the morning" drive him into an out of control rage. This raises major red flags.
 
What baying crowd? And he outed himself by going onto a TV channel and acting like a knob. It made no difference what any alleged baying mob did, he put it on a public forum.

As for political correctness the legal firm haven't fired him for being un pc. They have fired him because he's shown himself to be a liability given the nature of the work he does. If I ran such a business I'd be worried how he'd respond to an opposing Lawyer, especially as our legal system is adverserial.

In essence he has let a few idiot supporters singing "sacked in the morning" drive him into an out of control rage. This raises major red flags.

You've got experience in this area haven't you? What's the chances of a lawyer meeting face to face with the other side? Isn't it all done through negotiations about points that are made from a legal perspective? If it went to a face to face meeting in some court surely a barrister would take over?
 
"If you win, you need not have to explain....
If you lose, you should not be there to explain!"-Adolf Hitler.
Perhaps they should put this over the turnstiles at Anfield.
 
You've got experience in this area haven't you? What's the chances of a lawyer meeting face to face with the other side? Isn't it all done through negotiations about points that are made from a legal perspective? If it went to a face to face meeting in some court surely a barrister would take over?

Yes. However within his role he is gong to have to deal with people who have opposing views to him. Getting as riled as he did at a few muppets singing "sacked in the morning" hardly demonstrates those skills.

In the end that is a judgement call for his employer. You or I may disagree with his employers judgement. However to make out this is to do with political correctness or an imaginary baying mob "outing" him is nonsense. He outed himself by going on camera acting like a knob.

In the position he is in that is career suicide as has been found for him. Legal firms expect their people to be a bit better than football banter goons. The real world is not The Football factory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top