Ah right, I read the BBC story and it said "likely to be rejected".
Agree, the English premium is way over the odds. How much would we accept for stones and Barkley and sterling is ahead of them in development.
Just said on Radio city that it was likely to be rejected as they are holding out for closer to £50m for Wright-Phi.....I mean Sterling.Ah right, I read the BBC story and it said "likely to be rejected".
So they turn down a bid of £35m for Sterling and yet think a £10m bid for Nathaniel Clyne is fair? Am I missing something here...?
Deulofeu for £4-6m or Sterling for £35m+...
You're forgetting that Clyne isn't the bestest fullback in the world yet. That will only happen if, and when, he joins the RS. Then his value will rise commensurate with the status of the club that he has joined.So they turn down a bid of £35m for Sterling and yet think a £10m bid for Nathaniel Clyne is fair? Am I missing something here...?
HahahahahaTheir best player next season will be Lalana.
Hahahahaha
The best thing is, they have no 'legends' to cling to any more either!Exactly.
But they'll get what they want. City should just say 'thanks but no thanks' and look elsewhere. Ffs, Ox is a better player and they could probably get him for around £20milhilarious they rejected it. not even close to be worth 40m