ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[Dom1878]

We took into consideration of Mr Suarez’s apology, his personal statement,
supporting letter from Mr Brendan Rodgers and the letter from Ms Zoe Ward.
But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez’s denial of the
standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly
insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity
and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.

Thought that would come into it - I was expected 8 matches, and then thought they might have increased it because of what Suarez said

 

[Muppet Basher]

We took into consideration of Mr Suarez’s apology, his personal statement,
supporting letter from Mr Brendan Rodgers and the letter from Ms Zoe Ward.
But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez’s denial of the
standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly
insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity
and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.

Thought that would come into it - I was expected 8 matches, and then thought they might have increased it because of what Suarez said

Ha , so he talked himself into a longer ban..... it just gets better.

 

[davek]

They came to bite.

They let Luis walk alone.

 

[Tubey]

TBH I am amazed they didnt appeal that, the reasons given for the length of the ban are not nearly as conclusive as they should have been (no mention of his previous history of offending, no mention of the other incidents throughout the game).

He bit someone.

That's probably reason enough like!

 

[davek]

http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2012/12/david-moyes-shows-brendan-rodgers-how-to-be-a-real-leader.html

Old article, but very good.

The same James Kanwar that wrote the other critical piece this week.

I hope that feller's taking great care opening his mail.

 

[Dom1878]

Even though they couldn't take the last occurence into account, 10 games is fair.

7 matching the previous ban for biting someone, an extra 1 for doing it again, an extra one for saying 3 games is suitable, and an added one because of his past offences

 

[davek]

48.

Mr Suarez stated that he had spoken to Mr Ivanovic to apologise and Mr Ivanovic said that he had suffered no injury. We did not have any evidence to support this claim



Lying rat.

 

[helpimonfire]

Billy The Kid, On RAWK.


Because at the end of the day, this entire **** storm wouldn't be swirling around if Suarez had, you know, just not bit the ****ers arm.

 

[toffee-fellaini]

Billy The Kid, On RAWK.


Because at the end of the day, this entire **** storm wouldn't be swirling around if Suarez had, you know, just not bit the ****ers arm.

BAN HIM THE MANC

 

[davek]

****ing cranks.

 

[zirc]

The same James Kanwar that wrote the other critical piece this week.

I hope that feller's taking great care opening his mail.

Clearly a manc.

 

[davek]

Clearly a manc.

That's not far enough away. He'll have to go to high altitude in Nepal to avoid the fatwah about to break on him.

 

[Dom1878]

Dan Walker ‏@mrdanwalker2m
If the PL get a fair play place and #AFC finish top 5 then, as it stands, #LFC will be in the Europa League next season #FairPlay #Irony

 

[kenada_blue]

Again, I fail to understand what the player has done to warrant this sort of defence.

They get into a pure rage defending him against Evra. They say it's a misunderstanding when he dives. Now he bites someone, and they still defend him.

He's carried them to midtable and will jump ship if any champions league club come in for him. Yet he's done enough to make their club a laughing stock when they justify what he's done.

It's crazy.

 

[helpimonfire]

From Rawk

Sorry Guest, you are banned from using this forum!
Persistent winding up, got too tiresome.
This ban is not set to expire.

I only made 2 post lol.

2 is Persistent ha ha, Suarez is a Persistent biter.