ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[wandyr79]

Off RAWK

"Irrespective of how many games ban he has received he did this to himself and to the club.

The real discussion is whether or not to persist with him. Take the money?"
​

Followed by a MOD:

"Wrong on two counts. He didn't give himself a ten batch ban. And this thread is about calculating the ban not about selling Suarez. In the spirit of your post I'm giving you a ten day ban for detailing the thread. It's completely out of proportion but you did it to yourself. It take it you won't be asking for it to be reduced."

That man needs his end away.

Oi you over there, yes you, the one with your own mind...................GET OUT

 

[ScouseBlueBoy]

Jaimie Kanwar in call for "more abuse from kopites for Jaimie Kanwar":

http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2013/04/luis-suarez-10-game-ban-5-reasons-why-he-deserves-it.html

That lad has written a very good blog. He is speaking for the sane Anfield FC fans who have had enough of seeing their club's reputation destroyed by outsiders.

This is the way they used to be before the 'entitlement' factor set in.

 

[By god I'm blue]

Jaimie Kanwar in call for "more abuse from kopites for Jaimie Kanwar":

http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2013/04/luis-suarez-10-game-ban-5-reasons-why-he-deserves-it.html

That there Jamie Kanwar, is right bang on the money.

Take a bow son!

 

[bluejock]

Off RAWK

"Irrespective of how many games ban he has received he did this to himself and to the club.

The real discussion is whether or not to persist with him. Take the money?"
​

Followed by a MOD:

"Wrong on two counts. He didn't give himself a ten batch ban. And this thread is about calculating the ban not about selling Suarez. In the spirit of your post I'm giving you a ten day ban for detailing the thread. It's completely out of proportion but you did it to yourself. It take it you won't be asking for it to be reduced."

That man needs his end away.

Pahahahaha

What a ridiculous thunderc*nt of a man.

 

[tsubaki]

That lad has written a very good blog. He is speaking for the sane Anfield FC fans who have had enough of seeing their club's reputation destroyed by outsiders.

This is the way they used to be before the 'entitlement' factor set in.

That lad gets some fearful abuse as well, I think it started when he suggested Benitez might actually not be the greatest manager who ever lived.

 

[toffee-fellaini]

More RAWK bellendry:

'' Just a thought off top of my head - at the next home game how about organising the whole Kop to turn their back towards the pitch as a protest/defiance on the length of the ban perhaps when the premier league music begins? Think it would be symbolic and a message to those watching. ''

 

[tsubaki]

More RAWK bellendry:

'' Just a thought off top of my head - at the next home game how about organising the whole Kop to turn their back towards the pitch as a protest/defiance on the length of the ban perhaps when the premier league music begins? Think it would be symbolic and a message to those watching. ''

I wonder where they got that idea?

 

[kenada_blue]

Un-****ing believable Mr Rodgers

 

[toffee-fellaini]

Un-****ing believable Mr Rodgers

He's played into the hands of the cult. RAWK are in love with him now.

 

[Raymondo077]

That little rodent should be caught with a net, taken from that swamp in a cage and flown back to Uraguay, and after a period of quarantine released back into the wild where he belongs.

Hes a dangerous little [Poor language removed] FFS!!!

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

Off RAWK

"Irrespective of how many games ban he has received he did this to himself and to the club.

The real discussion is whether or not to persist with him. Take the money?"
​

Followed by a MOD:

"Wrong on two counts. He didn't give himself a ten batch ban. And this thread is about calculating the ban not about selling Suarez. In the spirit of your post I'm giving you a ten day ban for detailing the thread. It's completely out of proportion but you did it to yourself. It take it you won't be asking for it to be reduced."

That man needs his end away.

What a Gibbon that Mod is!

 

[Brennan]

'They have punished the man and not the incident'

WELL NO S**T Rodgers you belter. The FA have acted just like any judicial system in the world should, taking past behaviour into account.

I suppose if his darling son had been convicted of sexual assault he'd expect him to be given the same punishment as a serial rapist. Would he [Poor language removed].

 

[tsubaki]

Brendan - "there have been two instances of this (biting), both in 2006 - one got no ban, and was continued to be picked and supported by England, and the other got five game ban.... Luis Suarez got ten games"

I think you have missed one instance of biting there, Brendan.

 

[Ihaters]

They've emailed the 'Liverpool supporters club' chairman because he said the ban was justified.

''Mr Pedder your comments to BBC Sport are completely outside of your remit and certainly do not represent the views of myself or the other L.F.C. fans I know. You have contributed to the phoney moral outrage which continues to prejudice Luis Suarez, L.F.C. and its fans.
Your position as a member of a committee designed to represent L.F.C. fans (especially those in the Merseyside area) is untenable and I demand your immediate resignation.''

Lol, he sent it to the wrong supporters group as well.

 

[Del]

Poor old Suarez

A 10 Game ban,WOW

Its not like hes ever been in trouble before or has been banned for biting in the past,Or has recently been banned for being racist is it