Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
steveojcc said:
Haha!! couldn't just edit your first post no ? Two replies to my post haha!!

No offense but your fighting a losing battle in here. Your conjecture and generalizations are hilarious.

The fact that you asked 3 people to back up their claims or link an article and yet you continue to make remarks that are simply outrageous or made up from your own mind. You do no sort of backing up from your own comments.

You are clearly in denial as to what is going on and your reply to deny Trump supports Moore even though an actual tweet @LinekersLegs posted about Moore saying the President backs him says otherwise, Proves it.

Like i said you are clearly a troll. I am not going to waste my time with you.
Click to expand...
He backs him because he's a republican. So does the leader in the Senate.

He endorsed his opponent in the primary and thats what she accused trump of.
 
LiamG said:
I have actually tried to list facts no opinion and where have done so I have clearly stated that.

I the era of fake news we should really try to keep to the facts
Click to expand...

No you haven't. If i look back you have linked nothing other than your own comments. Just because you believe they are facts doesn't make it so. If you cannot back them up that's all anyone sees its your own theory or idea or opinion

LiamG said:
Do your research and you will get to the real story
Click to expand...

This is what we get from you with every reply. You ask people to back up their claims and when you reply you tell them to go do the above. Why don't you back up your claims or link an article or two?

Also "fake news" is a Trump term and is stretched way beyond it being true. Let me guess you dislike NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, Reuters etc... but love Breitbart and fox news ......
 
LiamG said:
So how did they get the warrant to wire tap Trump's team. Where did the evidence come from. What steps did they have to go through. Who were the major players.

Do your research and you will get to the real story
Click to expand...
In 2013-2014? Or are you referring to the FISA courts approval of a wiretap on Carter Page AFTER it was determined he was no longer a part of the campaign in summer of 2016? Manafort and Page have been subject to FBI wiretaps for quite a while. Long before they were involved with the campaign.

This is twice now you have asked me to "do my research". Perhaps you may wish to follow you own advice?
 
BlueTX said:
Conflation of two different matters. That some Christian conservatives in the United States "agree with Putin and respect him" has absolutely jack squat to do with Russian state actors interfering with the election in the United States. Whether that interference had impact or not is also immaterial to the action itself (if I collect no money during a bank robbery does not negate the fact that I tried to rob a bank).

Interestingly, your acknowledgment Putin has admirers in the United States among the voting populace could be viewed as an admission Russian efforts likely did have impact.
Click to expand...
You do realise it's not illegal what Russia did.

It is also done by every powerful country or individual.
 
LiamG said:
He backs him because he's a republican. So does the leader in the Senate.

He endorsed his opponent in the primary and thats what she accused trump of.
Click to expand...

Oh my god are you serious? That means he backs him then, Jesus wept seriously. That's what you were arguing that he didn't back him.
 
steveojcc said:
No you haven't. If i look back you have linked nothing other than your own comments. Just because you believe they are facts doesn't make it so. If you cannot back them up that's all anyone sees its your own theory or idea or opinion



This is what we get from you with every reply. You ask people to back up their claims and when you reply you tell them to go do the above. Why don't you back up your claims or link an article or two?

Also "fake news" is a Trump term and is stretched way beyond it being true. Let me guess you dislike NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, Reuters etc... but love Breitbart and fox news ......
Click to expand...
ABC the company that only a couple of days ago had to suspend a reporter about a misleading anti trump story that crashed the stock market or CNN who were handing the questions to Clinton during the primaries.

Yes very fair and balanced.

I think all media is biased. I think you need to read and watch both sides. There will be those that do and those that don't. I certainly don't need to show you how to use Google.

Its not about one individual link. I want you to leave your echo chamber.
 
LiamG said:
ABC the company that only a couple of days ago had to fire a reporter about a misleading anti trump story that crashed the stock market or CNN who were handing the questions to Clinton during the primaries.

Yes very fair and balanced.

I think all media is biased. I think you need to read and watch both sides. There will be those that do and those that don't. I certainly don't need to show you how to use Google.

Its not about one individual link. I want you to leave your echo chamber.
Click to expand...

Hahaha!!

Who said i stuck to certain media companies? I never said that.

If you were not a troll and had actually read through this forum you would see most of us on here post and discuss things from multiple sources of the media and not just the regulars.

As an Irishman living in the US i get my news from many sources not that i have to explain that to you.

See now i know you are a right wing troll. As you just labeled me without knowing a god damned thing about me

This is my last response to you because you are a waste of breath. You are like a puppy dog all over the place.
 
BlueTX said:
In 2013-2014? Or are you referring to the FISA courts approval of a wiretap on Carter Page AFTER it was determined he was no longer a part of the campaign in summer of 2016? Manafort and Page have been subject to FBI wiretaps for quite a while. Long before they were involved with the campaign.

This is twice now you have asked me to "do my research". Perhaps you may wish to follow you own advice?
Click to expand...
OK OK OK.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politics/paul-manafort-government-wiretapped-fisa-russians/index.html

"Sources say the second warrant was part of the FBI's efforts to investigate ties between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives. Such warrants require the approval of top Justice Department and FBI officials, and the FBI must provide the court with information showing suspicion that the subject of the warrant may be acting as an agent of a foreign power."

Given the situation with Paul Strzok and the Clinton campaign and dnc funding a fake dossier I would love to see transparency into how this was obtained.

But I guess you don't care about that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top