Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
That other tired argument..."but Trump is a shrewd business man...he might not get everything right on social politics, but he knows how to run a business..." has been debunked a million times. Here's 1,000,001th


How every investor lost money on Trump Tower Toronto (but Donald Trump made millions anyway)
Donald Trump called himself a “genius” for investing in Toronto’s Trump Tower. Behind the scenes, he had no money on the line. The inside story of an unlikely bankruptcy, and the investors who lost everything when they bet on the Trump brand.

Story here:

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...to-but-donald-trump-made-millions-anyway.html
 
TELEMMGLPICT000144637151_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqi8VutO5dPRPhdDWeqTKgl183IdHjwY15B0Jh21dlJlA.jpeg


I know it’s not trump but it was a potus......where’s his hand ?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/25/george-h-w-bush-apologises-accused-sexual-assault/
 

Firstly, i am not surprised. He represents the old school conservative right 1950's America type of man (no excuse by the way)...

She is probably not the first woman he has attempted this on. Again I am not excusing it. Any man that tries to take advantage is scum quite simply.

What i do take issue how a serious issue will now be "oh you have more sexual deviants than us" type of fight between conservatives and liberal in the pres and judging by fox they have already started that mantra.

These women are brave to come forward against these powerful men quite simply.

Pete to your point i would bet plenty more presidents and politicians across the world have acted the same way not just in the US.

I hope you are not trying to compare him to Trump and insinuate that Trump is not that bad because look Bush did it also.... Not sure what you are trying to gain here? I hope you are simply making commentary on how powerful men take advantage.

You won't curry favour making Trump seem to appear to fall in line with the behavior set by previous presidents and make out they all do it.

* Side note the actors he is posing with are in a very good show called 'Turn - Washington Spies' well worth a watch.
 
Firstly, i am not surprised. He represents the old school conservative right 1950's America type of man (no excuse by the way)...

She is probably not the first woman he has attempted this on. Again I am not excusing it. Any man that tries to take advantage is scum quite simply.

What i do take issue how a serious issue will now be "oh you have more sexual deviants than us" type of fight between conservatives and liberal in the pres and judging by fox they have already started that mantra.

These women are brave to come forward against these powerful men quite simply.

Pete to your point i would bet plenty more presidents and politicians across the world have acted the same way not just in the US.

I hope you are not trying to compare him to Trump and insinuate that Trump is not that bad because look Bush did it also.... Not sure what you are trying to gain here? I hope you are simply making commentary on how powerful men take advantage.

You won't curry favour making Trump seem to appear to fall in line with the behavior set by previous presidents and make out they all do it.

* Side note the actors he is posing with are in a very good show called 'Turn - Washington Spies' well worth a watch.

I wasn’t making any point....
 
This is a good example of something truly scandalous (if quite typical of the age): the latest take on the heirs to the government-subsidized opioid crisis fortune
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/30/the-family-that-built-an-empire-of-pain

They give lavishly to both parties, of course. As usual, what's most scandalous about America is what is legal.

Clearly, both parties have and will continue to contribute far more to problems like these then to solutions. And in fact, in some senses it is wrong to even consider the opioid crisis to be a problem, since it is the obvious end result of a bypartisan consensus to destroy public services and citizen rights and protections at the expense of untrammeled corporate rent-seeking.

But in any case, given that neither Party is going to do anything constructive, two alternatives remain: social democracy or Donald Trump. I don't think it's especially difficult to identify the constructive option from among the two, but then I'm an effete bi-coastal book reader (and a foreigner to boot).
 


It's quite instructive to see everything that Trump voters claimed to care about during the campaign become much worse afterwards, often as a direct result of his specific decisions.

Now that he's the President, very few of these apparent concerns actually seem to be troubling the Trumplings, and in this way, we can identify, by process of elimination, what actually seems to motivate most of them.

So far, the front-runners appear to be (for over 30s) a furious corn syrup-fuelled self-righteous indignation that middle-aged, middle-class, non-college educated suburban white men are the REAL victims of racism and (for under 30s) an immense angry frustration - and desire to childishly scapegoat - the fact that you're still a virgin.

Decaf Elliot Roger, in other words.

Not a lot of grumbling as far as I can make out about enduring poverty, industrial decay, drug addiction, a spiraling suicide rate, blatant corruption at every level of politics... a common misconception is that Trump voters care about these things, and responded in the only way their cholesterol-addled neurons could envision. This stems from the fact that they mostly live in parts of the country where these issues are most severe.

But on aggregate, Trump voters are not poor, and the only thing that consistently drives them is gorging on their own sense of victimhood.

Nobody performs identity politics with more destruction, selfishness, and nihilism than the people whose very identity itself is being the guy who won't stop complaining about identity politics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://apnews.com/877ee1015f1c43f1...eorgia-election-server-wiped-after-suit-filed

APNewsBreak: Georgia election server wiped after suit filed

A computer server crucial to a lawsuit against Georgia election officials was quietly wiped clean by its custodians just after the suit was filed, The Associated Press has learned.

The server’s data was destroyed July 7 by technicians at the Center for Elections Systems at Kennesaw State University, which runs the state’s election system. The data wipe was revealed in an email — sent last week from an assistant state attorney general to plaintiffs in the case — that was obtained by the AP. More emails obtained in a public records request confirmed the wipe.

The lawsuit, filed by a diverse group of election reform advocates, aims to force Georgia to retire its antiquated and heavily criticized election technology. The server in question, which served as a statewide staging location for key election-related data, made national headlines in June after a security expert disclosed a gaping security hole that wasn’t fixed six months after he reported it to election authorities.

WIPED OUT

It’s not clear who ordered the server’s data irretrievably erased.

The Kennesaw election center answers to Georgia’s secretary of state, Brian Kemp, a Republican who is running for governor in 2018 and is the main defendant in the suit. A spokeswoman for the secretary of state’s office said Wednesday that “we did not have anything to do with this decision,” adding that the office also had no advance warning of the move.

The center’s director, Michael Barnes, referred questions to the university’s press office, which declined comment.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit, who are mostly Georgia voters, want to scrap the state’s 15-year-old vote-management system — particularly its 27,000 AccuVote touchscreen voting machines, hackable devices that don’t use paper ballots or keep hardcopy proof of voter intent. The plaintiffs were counting on an independent security review of the Kennesaw server, which held electronic poll book data and ballot definitions for counties, to demonstrate the system’s unreliability.

Wiping the server clean “forestalls any forensic investigation at all,” said Richard DeMillo, a Georgia Tech computer scientist who has closely followed the case. “People who have nothing to hide don’t behave this way.”

STATE SECURITY

The server data could have revealed whether Georgia’s most recent elections were compromised by malicious hackers. The plaintiffs contend that the results of both last November’s election and a special June 20 congressional runoff— won by Kemp’s predecessor, Karen Handel — cannot be trusted.

Possible Russian interference in U.S. politics, including attempts to penetrate voting systems, has been an acute national preoccupation since the Obama administration first sounded the alarm more than a year ago.

Kemp and his GOP allies insist Georgia’s elections system is secure. But Marilyn Marks, executive director of the Coalition for Good Governance, a plaintiff, believes the server data was erased precisely because the system isn’t secure.

“I don’t think you could find a voting systems expert who would think the deletion of the server data was anything less than insidious and highly suspicious,” she said.

J.Tom Morgan, a former Georgia prosecutor, said destruction of the drive would not be a criminal act unless it was in violation of a protective court order (It appears no such order was requested). But it could seriously damage the defendants’ case, he said.

NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON’T

It could still be possible to recover relevant information from the server.

The FBI is known to have made an exact data image of the server in March when it investigated the security hole. The email that disclosed the server wipe said the state attorney general’s office was “reaching out to the FBI to determine whether they still have the image.”

Atlanta FBI spokesman Stephen Emmett, responding to AP questions, would not say whether that image still exists. Nor would he say whether agents examined it to determine whether the server’s files might have been altered by unauthorized users.

Other backups also appear to be gone. In the same email to plaintiffs’ attorneys, assistant state Attorney General Cristina Correia wrote that two backup servers were also wiped clean on Aug. 9, just as the lawsuit moved to federal court.

FAILING TO SERVICE THE SERVER

A 140-page collection of Kennesaw State emails, obtained Friday by the Coalition for Good Governments via an open records search, details the destruction of the data on all three servers and a partial and ultimately ineffective effort by Kennesaw State systems engineers to fix the main server’s security hole.

As a result of the failed effort, sensitive data on Georgia’s 6.7 million voters — including social security numbers, party affiliation and birthdates — as well as passwords used by county officials to access elections management files remained exposed for months.

The problem was first discovered by Atlanta security researcher Logan Lamb, who happened across it while doing online research in August 2016. He informed the election center’s director at the time, noting in an email that “there is a strong possibility your site is already compromised.”

Based on his review of the emails, Lamb believes that electronic polling books could have been altered in Georgia’s biggest counties to add or drop voters or to scramble their data. Malicious hackers could have altered the templates of the memory cards used in voting machines to skew results.

An attacker could even have modified “ballot-building” files to corrupt the count, said Lamb, who works at Atlanta-based Bastille Networks.

But it will be impossible to know for sure unless the FBI provides a copy of the server image for analysis.
 
1llx7j.jpg


Besides, that’s almost certainly some social network intern on her campaign team and not the woman herself.

Whereas I don’t think that excuse can be levelled at Trump’s tweets.

Clinton, if memory recalls, has confirmed previously that, she herself did not look after her twitter during the campaign. Although, now i would bet she does, seen as she has more free time haha!!

Most if not all sane politician's don't use twitter like he does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top