I really wouldn't have, because he would have been much more likely to actually carry out the things that Trump's many personal failings have thus far precluded.
Ironically, Trump's ineptitude is critical to the sense among Trump supporters that things are improving (though obviously, the illiberal bubble won't admit that at least in terms of the economic statistics we use to measure these things, this was apparent long before he arrived in the White House).
Had he actually managed to pass the health care bill, as Scott Walker might well have, this would decidedly not be the perception. People like Scott Walker and Paul Ryan have made it their life's mission to command the full power of the state to not just transfer wealth from rich to poor, but to take special care to humiliate the latter in the process. A uniquely American tradition of "libertarianism."
Did you read the entire article? You should.
No doubt even more TL;DR, but if anyone wants to know more about Scott Walker, this is one place to start:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...scott-walker-corporate-cash-american-politics
I've read it. We differ on a few points that doesn't bear review, as the questions that we will be dealing with are a bit more fraught than guaranteeing wealth transfers from public employee paychecks to public employee unions, to then be forwarded into political action committees for the state Democratic party. Not that the institutional GOP wouldn't have done the same if they'd have gotten the opportunity, which is a large part of my point.
No Lincoln is waiting on the horizon, and he wasn't a hero until he was dead anyway. Doing the right thing in that position in those kinds of times can kill a man.