Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
haha, you're comparing Biden to Putin and claiming Trump is getting unfairly politically treated?

I’m claiming it’s been done in a particularly stupid and cack handed manner and at just the wrong time……optics are important, Trump may well gain from this and the US will be viewed in a bad light…but it’s your country…..
 
I’m claiming it’s been done in a particularly stupid and cack handed manner and at just the wrong time……optics are important, Trump may well gain from this and the US will be viewed in a bad light…but it’s your country…..
And yet you haven’t explained how the process could have been improved - other than claiming that a different judge ahould have been selected or that it have been done “at the wrong time” without giving any indication as what you feel would be the “right” time.

As I understand it judges are chosen at random from limited pool, the locel DA being able to choose which judge would be a very bad idea.

You have not provided any actual evidence that this judge was unfair or biased.
 
I’m claiming it’s been done in a particularly stupid and cack handed manner and at just the wrong time……optics are important, Trump may well gain from this and the US will be viewed in a bad light…but it’s your country…..

Come on Pete, this is just lazy. You are banging on about a 34-count criminal case in which the defendant was unanimously judged as guilty by a jury, and how the optics are "bad." You want to talk bad optics: the Republicans have had fewer votes in 7 of the last 8 presidential elections but have managed a supermajority on SCOTUS of 6-3, of which two Republican-appointed justices have serious COIs when it comes to presiding over cases regarding January 6th. At least regarding Trump's criminal case, the optics are quite good as it says to the world that the USA still has a justice system that works. The excellent post by @TimHowardsBeardJuice goes into the mechanics of this process and was in response to your post, but it seems you didn't read it. How is a trial by jury against a US citizen bad optics for the USA?
 
And yet you haven’t explained how the process could have been improved - other than claiming that a different judge ahould have been selected or that it have been done “at the wrong time” without giving any indication as what you feel would be the “right” time.

As I understand it judges are chosen at random from limited pool, the locel DA being able to choose which judge would be a very bad idea.

You have not provided any actual evidence that this judge was unfair or biased.
And given statute of limitations DA was also limited on timing.

It's why the Carroll case was civil not criminal
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top