Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

[RAFUH]

Ok , for the sake of crossing an unwritten forum rule.

Since Epstein has died there has been more and more evidence being presented that bill Clinton was involved in whatever was going on with Epstein.

That includes pictures of him on the island , pictures with victims that have came forward etc.

Now as he isn't charged with anything and Epstein magically died I can't label him anything, innocent until proven guilty and all that.

But there's no smoke without fire. And there is a mounting amount of evidence that Clinton was to some extent involved.

To you use this in all cases or cherry pick?

25 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

 

[Kenshin]

To you use this in all cases or cherry pick?

25 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

They may have.

But it's very selective go turn a blind eye to potential paedophilia action is it not? Smoke without fire and all that.

Nobody cared about trump's misconduct when he wasn't president. People are choosing not to care about what potentially Clinton was involved in.

By all means attack trump for that, same principle and tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he was guilty of it.

However if bill is indeed connected to Epstein as it's becoming increasingly more likely, then Clinton is far worse......both of them.

 

[Disgruntledgoat]

Theres a reason "no smoke without fire" isnt part of any legal system

 

[roydo]

However if bill is indeed connected to Epstein as it's becoming increasingly more likely, then Clinton is far worse......both of them.

Dont understand that.

 

[summerisle]

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

“Innocent until proven guilty but there’s no smoke without fire” is a hell of a thing

 

[roydo]

Blimey. Is he sleeping through the night yet?

Cant wait for him to stop folk buying U2, Springsteen, Rolling Stones, and *insert random band* albums cos they have stopped him using their songs at his rallies.

 

[Kenshin]

Dont understand that.

If he is guilty of what he has been alleged to have been a part of , it is essentially child trafficking at the very least and potentially far worse than that.

There are pictures taken much like prince Andrew that puts him not only on location but with victims who have came forward.

Until he is found guilty I personally cannot say either way if it is true though. However given the many names that people try to attribute to it, bill has more evidence against him.

But innocent until proven guilty.

 

[roydo]

If he is guilty of what he has been alleged to have been a part of , it is essentially child trafficking at the very least and potentially far worse than that.

There are pictures taken much like prince Andrew that puts him not only on location but with victims who have came forward.

Until he is found guilty I personally cannot say either way if it is true though. However given the many names that people try to attribute to it, bill has more evidence against him.

But innocent until proven guilty.

I meant that I dont understand if you were defending either, nor if Clinton meant Bill or Hilary. Or both.

 

[Kenshin]

“Innocent until proven guilty but there’s no smoke without fire” is a hell of a thing

How so?

Means there is evidence that on the face of it connects the person to the crime but isn't evidence that proves guilt.

On this case , the person who would have arguably have been able to provide it , well you know what happened there.

 

[Kenshin]

I meant that I dont understand if you were defending either, nor if Clinton meant Bill or Hilary. Or both.

Well if he is guilty then his wife would have known what was going on surely?

If he is innocent then there is nothing to see here.

Who knows eh.

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

How so?

They’re antithetical to each other.

What you just described is not “no smoke without fire”.

 

[roydo]

Well if he is guilty then his wife would have known what was going on surely?

If he is innocent then there is nothing to see here.

Who knows eh.

I am obviously missing the point. Clinton, (Bill), knew Epstein, so did Trump. Thats proven.

So, if either were guilty of any activities involving children, they are both scum. And if one wife knew, I assume the other one did.

 

[Kenshin]

They’re antithetical to each other.

What you just described is not “no smoke without fire”.

So circumstantial evidence doesn't count for anything?

Nothing that proves guilt but heavy connections and photographic evidence is just coincidental?

Which it may be.

 

[Kenshin]

I am obviously missing the point. Clinton, (Bill), knew Epstein, so did Trump. Thats proven.

So, if either were guilty of any activities involving children, they are both scum. And if one wife knew, I assume the other one did.

There are many names being linked to this including trump. Not all have direct connections. Until anyone is in court and found guilty then we can't accuse anyone . I was just saying that bill has evidence out there, coincidental or not.

Noone knows the truth apart from those involved.

I was just saying in the first instance that calling trump the worst when compared to alleged and not proven claims about another former president may be a little bit unfair.

But not proven as of right now.n