Donald Trump for President Thread

[Harryflashman]

Are you saying Trump would do this? If so I fear you may be in for a shock.

Do you know though the truly frightening thing is I don't think anybody knows what he'd do . This is literally no political stance he could take in office that you could say would be a complete surprise , throughout his life he's flipflopped so many times . Even over accepting the result in recent days we've had about three or four different press strategies released from his own mouth , his VP , his family and his campaign manager has been all over the show .

On the bombing front though , this is a man who has openly and unashamedly advocated committing war crimes so I wouldn't hold my breath for a peaceful Presidency.

 

[dholliday]

Are you saying Trump would do this? If so I fear you may be in for a shock.

He's not in for gun control, but he would accept financial compensation from Russia to cease US meddling in Arab states.

He'd probably get assassinated for it tho'.

 

[GlosBlue]

He's not in for gun control, but he would accept financial compensation from Russia to cease US meddling in Arab states.

He'd probably get assassinated for it tho'.

Ha ha - he'd let Russia do what they want for a bit of cash. Always the businessman!

 

[Moomin]

how is that insulting? Because you are female? Does that mean females aren't getting behind Hilary because of that? Because i can promise you a section of males will be voting trump based on his sex. Same as people voted BREXIT here simply to vote against David cameron.

Because as i see it, What Clinton will do when she wins is break down a huge door that has long been locked which tells every single female in america that equality does exist and not only that, they can be the most powerful person in the country/world if they want to be.

So i know you want to keep writing me off and imply i'm being sexist but i am actually not. Rather the opposite, although clinton may not be a good president in the general sense, she will do something for equality much more than any other female since the early 1900s, which is a good thing

Personally, I think women will vote for what political party they feel most comfortable with. Not the gender of that leader.

I think you need to apologise for your dated sexist comments please.

 

[Karl Emil]

I'd vote Trump if I was american. Trump is a poor character, but I think the worst case scenario with Donald at the helm, is him being a bad politician. Hillary on the other hand is pure evil, she won't hesitate to sell out americans

 

[bicycleheader]

How am i categorising myself? I have openly admitted if i was american i would vote clinton in as the better choice.

It's appreciated Ash. Saves a lot of time. Cheers

 

[Moomin]

Hardly, she is literally running on being a woman

So if Hilary was a man, it would be a different story.

Wow, I thought sexism died years ago.

 

[4737carlin]

here is a question that i think needs to be put out there

Considering both candidates are bad choices. Would Hilary clinton be as supported or widespread unified as the better choice if she was not female?

also to a small extent (because trump clearly isn't a politician so most of it is standard) I think the country and especially actors, and females in general are uniting because she will be a female president, not because they back her views.

Because unless she has a massive change of beliefs, she believes in taking america to war and it would not suprise me if there was a huge military impact in that front once she took charge.

This is true this and she knows it, last night she was almost playing on it and using it as a card, the amount of times he mentioned womans rights and "think of the children" type lines, making an issue of the allegations against trump. Same on the pro life debate, although that will also win votes for Trump since there are a lot of pro lifers in America.
But I still think what she might do on that is put females of voting for him, but that dosent mean they will go and vote for her, just means less turn out.

 

[Ashtonian]

Personally, I think women will vote for what political party they feel most comfortable with. Not the gender of that leader.

I think you need to apologise for your dated sexist comments please.

It isn't sexist to suggest females will get behind potentially the first female president.

It is more pointing the obvious out. Same as people will vote against her because she is female. Same as people will vote for trump because he is off tv, same as racists and whatnot will support trump because of his comments about it.

Point is they aren't a majority and they aren't the only factor in someone being elected which i have not suggested to be the case. The majority of the people who vote for Clinton will be doing so on her ability as a politican which to be fair in all this, she is a bloody good one, whether you agree with her or not.

 

[GlosBlue]

It isn't sexist to suggest females will get behind potentially the first female president.

It is more pointing the obvious out. Same as people will vote against her because she is female. Same as people will vote for trump because he is off tv, same as racists and whatnot will support trump because of his comments about it.

Point is they aren't a majority and they aren't the only factor in someone being elected which i have not suggested to be the case. The majority of the people who vote for Clinton will be doing so on her ability as a politican which to be fair in all this, she is a bloody good one, whether you agree with her or not.

What about the females that vote Trump because they like his fetching hairstyle and dashing good looks?

 

[Ashtonian]

This is true this and she knows it, last night she was almost playing on it and using it as a card, the amount of times he mentioned womans rights and "think of the children" type lines, making an issue of the allegations against trump. Same on the pro life debate, although that will also win votes for Trump since there are a lot of pro lifers in America.
But I still think what she might do on that is put females of voting for him, but that dosent mean they will go and vote for her, just means less turn out.

yeah, all i am saying on the matter is that it is a factor same as it was for barack 8 years ago. Doesn't mean every single person is voting for her because she is female nor does it mean she is going to be elected because of it.

Think you say anything in this thread and it gets labelled as talking about something as if it is the only thing lol but from liverpool, wha ti have seen for a long time is prominant females coming out strongly in support of Hilary. Madonna apparantly was offering sexual acts in return for voting for her (terrible atempt at copying amy schumer who she was introducing at the time) Amy herself being very vocal, Sarah Silverman, Chelsea handler, Ellen de generas, to name just a few. that has been the overall impression of the campaign against trump, and where was the similar singular support for Barack back then? Madonna said nothing then, but suddenly her, and katy perry and all the rest suddenly urging your vote for hilary.

and for the record for anyone who wants to deem me sexist by simply suggesting it, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH A FEMALE PRESIDENT NOR AS A POLITICAN AND SHE IS THE BEST PERSON OUT THE TWO FOR THE JOB.

 

[Ashtonian]

What about the females that vote Trump because they like his fetching hairstyle and dashing good looks?

That could well exist, but the numbers who would would be very minimal, and visa versa

there is 101 different 'voting because of' scenarios that could well exist, speculate all we want on them. Could be men voting for trump because they fancy him even!

 

[Moomin]

It isn't sexist to suggest females will get behind potentially the first female president.

It is more pointing the obvious out. Same as people will vote against her because she is female. Same as people will vote for trump because he is off tv, same as racists and whatnot will support trump because of his comments about it.

Point is they aren't a majority and they aren't the only factor in someone being elected which i have not suggested to be the case. The majority of the people who vote for Clinton will be doing so on her ability as a politican which to be fair in all this, she is a bloody good one, whether you agree with her or not.

Just stop, before you start upsetting all the females who post on here.

 

[Harryflashman]

This is true this and she knows it, last night she was almost playing on it and using it as a card, the amount of times he mentioned womans rights and "think of the children" type lines, making an issue of the allegations against trump. Same on the pro life debate, although that will also win votes for Trump since there are a lot of pro lifers in America.
But I still think what she might do on that is put females of voting for him, but that dosent mean they will go and vote for her, just means less turn out.

Recognising that he's isolating women with his words and deeds and using to appeal to women isn't running as a woman . Clinton has also used his record of abusing race or beating down on immigrants to appeal to black and Latino voters and she isn't black or Latina either .

 

[Ashtonian]

Just stop, before you start upsetting all the females who post on here.

how would i? Genuinely, how would i be upsetting females, simply by mentioning them? I talk about men in the everton forum and no-one seems to get upset about that, simply mentioning females and all of a sudden i am sexist and offensive?

lol