Donald Twain
Vide cor meum
It was dire stuff and my lad hasn't forgiven me for making him watch it.I voted Stones, but thought there should be an honourable mention for anyone who sat and watched through all of that sh1te...
It was dire stuff and my lad hasn't forgiven me for making him watch it.I voted Stones, but thought there should be an honourable mention for anyone who sat and watched through all of that sh1te...
Shocked people voted for naismith. Ball retention was p@@s poor. I would have taken him off earlier.
Besic for me with mention to 2 cbs. Stones is a special talent.
Only problem naismith was giving was to us for giving the ball away. He worked hard as usual but a serious lack of quality in the final third. Amazing how people see things different as nearly everyone sitting around me thought the same thing on sat. Thats football I suppose, never gonna agree on everythingNaismith played well, gave Liverpool a problem in midfield, if we took him off early on it would of been a much easier game for Liverpool.
Naismith played well, gave Liverpool a problem in midfield, if we took him off early on it would of been a much easier game for Liverpool.
It will improve. I can see him being our long term No1.Well I believe they will work on that weakness and nail it. I am impressed with his collection of crosses now whereas that used to be his weakness when flapping and punching clear. His run of games has certainly given him a boost and he is less nervous and being more assertive. Hope it continues.
I guess we'll never know. If you are right Barkley has a lot of improving to do.Naismith played well, gave Liverpool a problem in midfield, if we took him off early on it would of been a much easier game for Liverpool.
someone doesn't like democracy, sorry mate but until you become the fascist dictator of GOT that you so obviously crave to be, the people will have their sayWe should just start calling these threads the "besic automatically gets MOTM because he is the fans favourite thread"
McCarthy all day
Tough one with Naismith. I imagine he's a right pain in the arse to play against. But doesn't really add anything going forward quality wise. Unless we manage to create a chance for him. Then he usually slots. But there's a distinct lack of quality there. But the effort.
He's a curious case.
Naismith has six league goals from 18 involvements, Barkley has one from 15 involvements.
I don't think that bringing Barkley in for Naismith will improve anything , just reduce our goal threat.
We should just start calling these threads the "besic automatically gets MOTM because he is the fans favourite thread"
McCarthy all day