Results are results. Used to annoy me under Dyche when any win was explained away as a fluke but every loss was a damning indictment. Another day Barry scores in the first half and Alcaraz’s shot flies in the top corner without Henderson’s strong hand, so there’s zero point in all this ‘yeah but if Mateta scores we’d have lost 3-0’ etc. Football is a game purely of outcomes, the outcome was an Everton win, there’s no point getting into hypotheticals.
A lot to be said for winning when performances aren't good too!
I think the best we've played this season was Villa, and we dropped points. Poor against Brighton and Crystal Palace and won!
A lot will depend on injuries etc. If Tarks is fit then, crap as he has been, I can't see anything other than him starting.Garner at RB and O'Brien at CB. Wonder if he'll go with that sensible option at City![]()
I agree with the basic principle, but the issue is when people start to say stuff like 'why are we so inconsistent' when our performance levels are actually perfectly consistent and it's basically a coin toss as to whether we get a result or not. We can be happy that we won and not have to say it's a fluke but also acknowledge that we didn't actually play particularly well and were comfortably second best for the majority of the game, so similar performance are likely to see us not get the same result in future.Results are results. Used to annoy me under Dyche when any win was explained away as a fluke but every loss was a damning indictment. Another day Barry scores in the first half and Alcaraz’s shot flies in the top corner without Henderson’s strong hand, so there’s zero point in all this ‘yeah but if Mateta scores we’d have lost 3-0’ etc. Football is a game purely of outcomes, the outcome was an Everton win, there’s no point getting into hypotheticals.
Looking at it that way, I feel more optimistic. I've felt disappointed with our results, but before the season started, if you'd said a draw with Villa and Palace and 3 points off West Ham, I would've been happy. So whilst it's 3 against Palace. We've still achieved 5 points.Fully agree. Everton controlled the game against Villa and on another day Beto bags a brace and it's a regulation 2-0 home win. But it was draw you have to blow your nose and move on.
5 points collectively home to Villa, West Ham (I think they will be better away than at home under Nuno) and Crystal Palace is pretty good. 2 or 3 points would have been a very disappointing return.
I didn't hear anything where I was.Reported of DM out chants at half time ? I never heard them on the TV ?
Hope yesterday showed him definitively that Barry & Dibling shouldn't be starting games together, certainly at this early stage.
Dunno why he hasn't be utilising Alcaraz more but he was crying out for that starting berth yesterday in KDH's absence.
Probably guff then ....I didn't hear anything where I was.
I don't think he'll drop Tarks (and I don't know if it would be a good idea either) but I'd be interested to see how Branthwaite and O'Brien as CBs with Garner as RB would affect how we can play. Probably with CBs a bit higher and with more ball-playing ability, and someone who can deliver good crosses from RB.Garner at RB and O'Brien at CB. Wonder if he'll go with that sensible option at City![]()