My argument is that you are obsessed by young players and as such cannot give an objective view of Gibson's performance.
My evidence is what I saw with my own eyes yesterday - Gibson was better than most of our other outfield players. He won headers, tracked back, put himself in position to receive the ball and tried to be positive without giving it away. He also kept talking to his team mates and when needed, the ref.
You ignore all that, focus on a foul that was necessary and that most experienced players would make and try to make out that a youth player who had a good 10 minute cameo is the next Zidane, whilst ignoring the fact that said youth player is up against players who have spent 80 minutes running around and that once he came on and that Besic had changed to a deeper position (his more natural position) once Barkley had come on.
Where you live has nothing to do with your lack of understanding of the game, nor did I claim that it did.