Cycling thread 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you know if that power data is from his bike, or is it the strava estimated one? Sort of surprised they'd release his real values if that's what they are.

https://www.strava.com/activities/345923267/segments/8223093781

it's from his bike, he always gives his data

team sky have said that they think froomes data has been hacked from his latest training sessions and that people are adding 2+2 and getting 6 from what they are seeing apparently.

are team sky paranoid?? or trying to hide something?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/33517897

which is nothing to do with the strava post you quoted
 

The data is from Ventoux in 2013, when his numbers where even lower than today, 5.9 w/kg

Which, again, is perfectly normal you'd imagine as it's a 21km climb, so surely it's to be expected to be a bit lower than a 9-10km climb? There just seems a lack of real rigour to the debates. I mean you'd imagine that all of the changes to training that Sky have bought in would do 'something', but no one seems to have any clue as to just what or how much. Without that, how can anyone really say what gains are bona fide and what are chemically enhanced?
 
Agree that it's pointless looking at isolated power numbers and trying to draw conclusions. Whatever he is doing now, it's his (Froome's) rise from nowhere that is the most incredible and hard to rationalise. It's like you know Chris down the pub, skinny bloke who does a bit of cycling - he just came second in the Vuelta. Plus he's got a tropical disease that not a lot of people know about.
 
Agree that it's pointless looking at isolated power numbers and trying to draw conclusions. Whatever he is doing now, it's his (Froome's) rise from nowhere that is the most incredible and hard to rationalise. It's like you know Chris down the pub, skinny bloke who does a bit of cycling - he just came second in the Vuelta. Plus he's got a tropical disease that not a lot of people know about.

To be fair though in road racing terms it's no more strange than the improvement in Wiggins. Indeed Froome's early grand tours were better than Brad's.
 


My dad prefers Eurosport over ITV.

Something about the commentary he said.

I tend to agree, although it seems that most cycling commentators are a bit marmite. With so much air time to fill they have to talk a lot, and if you don't like the blokes then it can be a major turn-off. Good way to learn new languages though, tuning in to some of the smaller races on a dodgy foreign stream ;)
 
I tend to agree, although it seems that most cycling commentators are a bit marmite. With so much air time to fill they have to talk a lot, and if you don't like the blokes then it can be a major turn-off. Good way to learn new languages though, tuning in to some of the smaller races on a dodgy foreign stream ;)
On a tenuously relatedn note I'm doing one of those Sky rides with him.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top