Crypto currency (IF banned from CA)

Status
Not open for further replies.


It would be buying gold electronically.

This is a similar model


Can gain 8% interest on this via Nexo as well. Amazing stuff.

Regulated mainstream DeFi more generally is going to be an incredible shift in the finance world. AllianceBlock will be launching a single sided liquidity mining (with minimal impermanent loss) product shortly. Can't wait for it.
 
Doesn't Bitcoin consumre more electricity than most countries in Africa, more than Ireland and nearly 160 countries in total?

"Cambridge’s Centre for Alternative Finances estimates that bitcoin’s annualised electricity consumption hovers just above 115 terawatt-hours (TWh) while Digiconomist’s closely tracked index puts it closer to 80 TWh.

A single transaction of bitcoin has the same carbon footprint as 680,000 Visa transactions or 51,210 hours of watching YouTube, according to the site.

A paper from 2018 from the Oak Ridge Institute in Ohio found that one dollar’s worth of bitcoin took 17 megajoules of energy, more than double the amount of energy it took to mine one dollar’s worth of copper, gold and platinum. Another study from the UK published last year said that computer power required to mine Bitcoin quadrupled in 2019 compared with the year before, and that mining has had an influence in prices in some power and utility markets
."

Some have pointed out that there does not have to be a tradeoff between cryptocurrency and the environment. The creators of ethereum, considered the second most popular type of cryptocurrency after bitcoin, have promised to change the currency’s algorithm to make its mining more environmentally friendly.

Vitalik Buterin, the computer scientist who invited ethereum, told IEEE Spectrum that mining cryptocurrency can be “a huge waste of resources, even if you don’t believe that pollution and carbon dioxide are an issue”, Buterin said. “There are real consumers – real people – whose need for electricity is being displaced by this stuff.”
 
I just don’t see the demand for any government backed digital currency

One of the main purposes of government backed currencies is to take power from retail banks, and shift it to governments and central banks. There's a lot to be said for that.

For a start it would take power from banks who really shouldn't be trusted. There'd be greater access to banking. Greater control of welfare payments & subsidies to citizens. Almost instant payments. Extremely low costs of finance.

There's a lot of benefit to digitising currency. It's not to be confused with other speculative cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin.

The big worry would be destabilising bank's loan books, and moving them to the periphery of the economy. Also, would central banks and governments be ready to be retail facing? Nobody really knows how that would go.
 

All said and done I'd rather it crash so I can buy in again in bulk.
And that mentality is why I find it interesting from a trading aspect - seems to be lots of people who feel the same way (even if not in some of the altcoins at least for Bitcoin) so it will have a trading floor which will likely attract new/extra money.

There was some of that bid in the dotcom boom but it didn’t seem as resilient to large % drops.
Then the second thing that happened is I got a call [from billionaire hedge fund manager] Paul Jones and he says, “do you know that when Bitcoin went from $17,000 to $3000 that 86% of the people that owned it at $17,000, never sold it?” Well, this was huge in my mind. So here’s something with a finite supply and 86% of the owners are religious zealots. I mean, who the hell holds something through $17,000 to $3000? And it turns out none of them — the 86% — sold it. Add that to this new Central Bank craziness phenomenon.

[A few years pass] and it goes up to $6,000 in the middle of the last spring. I got to buying some just because these kids on the West Coast are already worth more than I am, and they’re going to be making a lot more money than me in the future. For some reason, they’re looking at this thing the way I’ve always looked at gold, which is a store of value if I don’t trust fiat currencies.
 
And that mentality is why I find it interesting from a trading aspect - seems to be lots of people who feel the same way (even if not in some of the altcoins at least for Bitcoin) so it will have a trading floor which will likely attract new/extra money.

There was some of that bid in the dotcom boom but it didn’t seem as resilient to large % drops.
Then the second thing that happened is I got a call [from billionaire hedge fund manager] Paul Jones and he says, “do you know that when Bitcoin went from $17,000 to $3000 that 86% of the people that owned it at $17,000, never sold it?” Well, this was huge in my mind. So here’s something with a finite supply and 86% of the owners are religious zealots. I mean, who the hell holds something through $17,000 to $3000? And it turns out none of them — the 86% — sold it. Add that to this new Central Bank craziness phenomenon.

[A few years pass] and it goes up to $6,000 in the middle of the last spring. I got to buying some just because these kids on the West Coast are already worth more than I am, and they’re going to be making a lot more money than me in the future. For some reason, they’re looking at this thing the way I’ve always looked at gold, which is a store of value if I don’t trust fiat currencies.
You see you still look at it from a very microeconomic trading buy low / sell high perspective.

you need to look further into it than that to analyse it’s behaviours.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top