Computer games.

You are accusing people of confirmation bias whilst being the most blatant example of it.

I am glad you're liking it, but let's not pretend people having problems with it is solely because they want to have problems with it. It's a game with Monster Energy as a core mechanic - it's not a 'masterpiece' for that reason alone.

I maintain that if this wasn't made by Kojima, you wouldn't be arsed about it. Sorry, but I'm convinced of it.

I admit I’m a fanboy you won’t admit your are the other extreme. Only indirectly through what you post. I like you tubey but on this one we will have to agree to disagree.
 

I admit I’m a fanboy you won’t admit your are the other extreme. Only indirectly through what you post. I like you tubey but on this one we will have to agree to disagree.

I'm not the other extreme, as that would require me hating Kojima for some reason.

I simply don't. Indeed I'm quite the opposite - I respect him as an innovator. I'm just extremely unimpressed by what I've seen of this game. I don't see Monster Energy sponsorship, fetch quests and Kojima's name flashing up once every five minutes as innovation.
 
I'm not the other extreme, as that would require me hating Kojima for some reason.

I simply don't. Indeed I'm quite the opposite - I respect him as an innovator. I'm just extremely unimpressed by what I've seen of this game. I don't see Monster Energy sponsorship, fetch quests and Kojima's name flashing up once every five minutes as innovation.

That’s cause them things are not innovative.
 

It’s the grand turismo of post man pat simulators. It’s a masterpiece. It answers such questions like what if Zelda was boring?. on purpose!?

Or what if Assassins Creed hated you?

GT is also bad once you've played Forza, Jay.

I am not surprised at this admission Con

Thanks Bry. Grass density is good but we want good games.
 


Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top