Great fighter golovkin. Even better blufferlol
He got hurt by a welter there. He would have won like but brook gave him a scare.
He got hurt by a welter there. He would have won like but brook gave him a scare.
Great fighter golovkin. Even better blufferlol
He got hurt by a welter there. He would have won like but brook gave him a scare.
If you think Brook is a welter then you're mad.Great fighter golovkin. Even better blufferlol
He got hurt by a welter there. He would have won like but brook gave him a scare.
He got beat as expected , same as Khan v canelo . Both were always going to give it a go in the early rounds but the size difference and quality was always going to catch up with both of them .
Don't be softBrook gave 100 times a better showing there than Khan did against canelo.
If you think Brook is a welter then you're mad.
but Khan is a natural 140/147lb fighter and can't take a punch . Brook is a big welter . Khan might outbox him but brook would catch him and flatten him . Khan cannot find to a game plan for a full 12 rounds . That's were he would come unstuckHe's a much better boxer than Brook.
I respect Kell for tonight, and I think his corner should have left him in but he didn't have Golovkin hurt at all.
Hahahahahahahaha
Bin
He's admitted himself he'd be happier at 154He's fought mostly at welter so I base my opinion on that. I sadly don't know his BMI to give a clinical opinion....
Shut up and bend over, ye whining bishBad homophobe you
Khan arguably won 4 of the first 5 rounds in the canelo fight . I don't agree with that myself BUT a lot of boxing experts held that view .Brook gave 100 times a better showing there than Khan did against canelo.
I'm biased?Was ahead on cards, take the biased specs off lad.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.