
Rodrigo
So how do people view Lee's time in charge?
Was he a much maligned manager who with a bit of luck could have achieved a place in history,or as the dour persona
that he was often portrayed as?
...it's not so much that these players should've won something, more a case that you would like to have seen them win something. I'm not a fan of Mick Lyons but can understand the affinity some fans have with him. For me, Tim Cahill is a much more deserving case, tremendous servant with real quality and commitment. You were rarely let down by a Tim Cahill performance.
Can understand that thought, but Mike Lyons would have played for nothing and in purely financial terms, compared to what Tim Cahill earned as a blue, Lyons did play for nothing. Both donned the royal blue with pride and passion, and in their own respective ways, set the tone for the teams they played in.
Left Latchford out on purpose to see if anyone said him quick. Next post lol
Gordon Lee finished 4th didn't he? That'd be ace these days - viewed as a failure.
Cant recall that mate.Do you remember the derby at the pit Dave when he lobbed Georgie Wood for an oggie at the Kop,?would have crushed many a man,he went on and was our man of the match led us to what was at the time a very creditable 2-2 draw.
third and fourth in consecutive seasons groucho,champions league these days,the team was bloody attractive to watch back then despite the media perception of "dour Gordon."
As it should beMentality was different back then. I've said the same to my Dad who first started watching us in the 70s. As far as he was concerned - No silverware = Not good enough.
As it should be
NSNO it was then and should always be mate.Mentality was different back then. I've said the same to my Dad who first started watching us in the 70s. As far as he was concerned - No silverware = Not good enough.