6 + 2 Point Deductions

Leylo · 2025-11-21T23:37:46+0000

Neiler said:
View attachment 334087

The other shower just spent best part of half a billion pounds wtf

JimEFC_2 · 2025-11-21T23:53:16+0000

trueblue84 said:
Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Crystal Palace, Fulham and Leeds voted against the change.

Leeds because they wanted to spend 800% of turnover and take the Ridsdale rollercoater one ladt time

JimEFC_2 · 2025-11-21T23:56:40+0000

Neiler said:
View attachment 334087

Thanks.for posting this.

Lookiing at your chart here...Whats the point of this rule? Are they saying Brenford could now spend 100m on players and ruin their wage structure and destroy their business if they want to?
What does this change except that now youre allowed to lose more than 105m over 3 years?

JimEFC_2 · 2025-11-21T23:59:40+0000

trueblue84 said:
Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Crystal Palace, Fulham and Leeds voted against the change.

Us, Villa and Arsenal have really.let down the top half of the alphabet here im this vote

Neiler · 2025-11-22T00:04:11+0000

JimEFC_2 said:
Thanks.for posting this.

Lookiing at your chart here...Whats the point of this rule? Are they saying Brenford could now spend 100m on players and ruin their wage structure and destroy their business if they want to?
What does this change except that now youre allowed to lose more than 105m over 3 years?

I’d take those figures with a pinch of salt mate, based on last published ac lungs and wage bill.

The agenda here was two factored in my opinion. 1. To put a cap on what City and Newcastle can spend and 2. Ensure PL clubs can continue to spend so they can continue to improve and sell the product.

I think the only reason PSR was scrapped is that it stoped teams spending which in turn meant the “product” was diluted which lessons its value.

What happened today is they’ve tied the state owned clubs into a capped no, while given everyone else scope to invest more, so they can continue to sell TV right fir the PL home and abroad.