why are they not allowed to say when the date is for Man City's hearing?
That isn't correct though we were paying payday loan rates when interest rates were at historical lows. We were doing that because traditional lenders saw us as a terrible risk because we were only a going concern because a rich owner was pumping money into the club.And again the question is, should a team who are taking out loans to try and get their finances back in order, really be punished under sustainability rules? Especially at a time when interest rates rose significantly - are we not allowed mitigation on rate rises since they are outside our control.
So we could get 4 points back from the first one. Then get given 6 again for this one. It wouldn’t be fair but I think we would still manage to stay up. If we don’t get any points back and are given an extra 10 points deduction I think we are doomed.If the minimum is 6 points, which is what the PL suggested, it'll be 6.
why are they not allowed to say when the date is for Man City's hearing?
Select Committees sre the only time you see MPs actually doing their job properly.
Yes they did complain. Steve Parish has even said there's been issues with it from the clubs especially the rolling 3 years.
"Spending within your means" re-enforces the idea that it's a closed shop of top 6 who have more means. None of whom gained them within FFP rules.
Every other club then can't get near them unless they follow a model Brighton are doing (but low, sell high) but that still isn't getting them through the ceiling and won't do unless they keep their best players and add. But that doesn't happen when Chelsea buy one of them for money you can't turn down.
And the wheels keep spinning.
Dr Rupa Huq, Labour MP for Ealing. Had Masters squirming when trying to explain how an open sanctions policy with absolutely no defined criteria could possibly be clear and fair. His only reply was that it was what the clubs voted for. I think the 'Super Silk' will have a field day with this at the appeal.'It just seems fishy to me'
Whoever that MP was who grilled Masters there over our points deduction is a hero lol
Extra 10 would make it difficult but if we got 10 Forest would get moreSo we could get 4 points back from the first one. Then get given 6 again for this one. It wouldn’t be fair but I think we would still manage to stay up. If we don’t get any points back and are given an extra 10 points deduction I think we are doomed.
That isn't correct though we were paying payday loan rates when interest rates were at historical lows. We were doing that because traditional lenders saw us as a terrible risk because we were only a going concern because a rich owner was pumping money into the club.
The whole point of fair play and PSR rules is to protect clubs from reckless owners. Even with us having to sell players, even with us having to reign in spending on players, we are still a billion pounds in debt. Imagine how bad that would be if Moshiri had been allowed free reign to go on mismanaging the club.
The club owes money all over the place and we still need to find 100's of millions to finish the Stadium. Yet people still want to back the board and pretend it is a massive conspiracy to get poor little Everton. It is nuts.
777s brown envelopes aren’t big enough - simple as that.Then why have the PL not said to 777 'here is a date (insert date) answer the questions by this date or sod off basically'
That isn't correct though we were paying payday loan rates when interest rates were at historical lows. We were doing that because traditional lenders saw us as a terrible risk because we were only a going concern because a rich owner was pumping money into the club.
The whole point of fair play and PSR rules is to protect clubs from reckless owners. Even with us having to sell players, even with us having to reign in spending on players, we are still a billion pounds in debt. Imagine how bad that would be if Moshiri had been allowed free reign to go on mismanaging the club.
The club owes money all over the place and we still need to find 100's of millions to finish the Stadium. Yet people still want to back the board and pretend it is a massive conspiracy to get poor little Everton. It is nuts.
That isn't correct though we were paying payday loan rates when interest rates were at historical lows. We were doing that because traditional lenders saw us as a terrible risk because we were only a going concern because a rich owner was pumping money into the club.
The whole point of fair play and PSR rules is to protect clubs from reckless owners. Even with us having to sell players, even with us having to reign in spending on players, we are still a billion pounds in debt. Imagine how bad that would be if Moshiri had been allowed free reign to go on mismanaging the club.
The club owes money all over the place and we still need to find 100's of millions to finish the Stadium. Yet people still want to back the board and pretend it is a massive conspiracy to get poor little Everton. It is nuts.
I'm really, really close mate. It's zero fun.Media already trying to sell Branthwaite to one of the 6, I hate this competition. I have made the decision to stop watching and it gets easier and easier to stick with that judgement.
Genuinely wish I could turn Everton off and be done with football completely.