Yeah think so.Can I clarify...its just the charge today isn't it? Not the punishment
We’ll find out any punishments later in the season. Or potentially during the summer break.
Farcical.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah think so.Can I clarify...its just the charge today isn't it? Not the punishment
Yes, but they theory is that one bad year can be balanced out by good years either side of it - so doesn’t get punished at all.So in theory, on a rolling 3 year basis, we can be done for one bad year three separate times?
That seems more than a touch unfair
Haha surely not! He was on the panel for Niasse's retrospective diving ban where we were only one of two teams to get a punishment, strangely enough the RS who are and were notorious for diving never got anything.I have seen the reports that they want to speed up the process but feel that it would not be fair and reasonable for the prem to have failed in its enforcement responaibilities and to increase the punishment of clubs as a result of this, potentially putting said clubs under threat of administration. They'd be entering a legal.minefield.
The rumours that Danny Murphy is to be brought on as an advisor to the panel doesn't sound great though. Fair enough get a players view but that rat!
Can I clarify just the charge today isn't it? Not the punishment
They won't be informed before anyone else.….believe me, they also base their odds on information.
Thinking isn't a strong point on any Forest fan board….thats what they seem to think on the Forest Fans Forum. It’ll be some weeks until the punishment.
Last seen nude running down the 62 with his willy between his legs so it looks like he had girl parts.Matty hasn't been seen since midnight
In real business life is near impossible to have a really bad year which is then followed by 2 profitable years. Businesses may take a few years before they become profitable, and by taking another hit in the form of relegation and/or point deductions, it's becoming even harder.Yes, but they theory is that one bad year can be balanced out by good years either side of it - so doesn’t get punished at all.
The trouble is having one terrible year sandwiched between bad years (bad being a loss just inside the allowable limit)
It is on the RS alternative tableNot on mine it doesn't.
The table on the official PL website has us on 14 points which is interesting
They won't be informed before anyone else.
Plus it's a double punishment...point deductions which put you in danger of relegation, plus losing revenue by finishing lower than you would have expected to without a point penalty, meaning less revenue so making more difficult the following year for the new psr cycle. Its ridiculous.So in theory, on a rolling 3 year basis, we can be done for one bad year three separate times?
That seems more than a touch unfair