6 + 2 Point Deductions

It was a tongue in cheek comment mainly pointing towards the fact that Masters is acting like a devious snake whereas Parry is at least trying to give straight responses. All i want is external oversight with an independent regulator no matter who is in charge. The PL is completely out of control.
No probs mate…Parry is a much better operator than Masters which is abundantly clear today…he’s still a Kopite though!
 
And along similiar lines the Profit and Sustainability rules are expected to be changed in August. Possibly will mean that “guilty” now under the current rules may well be innocent in September!
Potentially we could be relegated on the back of rules that are so flawed now that they require changing :rant: !

Nothing has been confirmed but of the new changes have been rumoured that wagebills can be maximum 70% of turnover to line up with UEFA's rule apparently.

We would have broken that for the last 7 years at least.
 
Nothing has been confirmed but of the new changes have been rumoured that wagebills can be maximum 70% of turnover to line up with UEFA's rule apparently.

We would have broken that for the last 7 years at least.
So, if we use the official points deduction calculator, 3 points per year for 7 years is 21 points, we round it down to multiples of ten so that's 20 points deducted, add the ten points we have already had deducted, and our total deduction will be 30 points for the season.

Can we still avoid relegation?
 

Sick of certain fans/clubs parroting on about city 115 charges not getting heard before us.

We all know those fans and clubs only want to see city battered even more harshly than we have been, and to take any potential trophies off them ( never happen in a minion years but keep dreaming).

They don’t care about Everton, Notts Forest or any other club and how unfairly we’ve been treated for building a brand new stadium during covid and brexit, or for Forest for just trying to be competitive in the premier league after promotion or how badly FFP and P&S is for any club outside of the cartel. Keep our clubs name out of your filthy mouths if you only want us to be used as a stick to beat city with.

I heard this morning on talkshite, MCoist and Townsend giving forest stick for not selling Johnson on the cheap, at £15 million less than they eventually got, to spurs just to comply with these broken, rigged rules - unbelievable nonsense and exactly what’s wrong with this bastardised version of football.

Majority of the media coverage is just kopites wanting City punished, they couldn’t give one about Forest or Everton.

The PSR was an absolute genius piece of legislation by the big clubs. ‘Sell your players to us for whatever price we choose within a certain time limit or points deductions come your way, meanwhile we can buy whoever we want with no limits whatsoever’. It’s absolutely genius but has completely screwed football more than it already was.
 
Nothing has been confirmed but of the new changes have been rumoured that wagebills can be maximum 70% of turnover to line up with UEFA's rule apparently.

We would have broken that for the last 7 years at least.
can be sorted though, especially in a new ecosystem where everyone has to follow those rules. Maybe some sort of grace period (immediate from announcement) to the end of contracts, any new contracts have to be compliant.

Big issue is when revenues drop, but wage bill remains higher and you can't sell players. Have to give them away and impact revenues further?
 
So, if we use the official points deduction calculator, 3 points per year for 7 years is 21 points, we round it down to multiples of ten so that's 20 points deducted, add the ten points we have already had deducted, and our total deduction will be 30 points for the season.

Can we still avoid relegation?
Aren’t they supposed to be saying clubs won’t face point deductions though and it would be fines instead.
 


Yes they did complain. Steve Parish has even said there's been issues with it from the clubs especially the rolling 3 years.

"Spending within your means" re-enforces the idea that it's a closed shop of top 6 who have more means. None of whom gained them within FFP rules.

Every other club then can't get near them unless they follow a model Brighton are doing (but low, sell high) but that still isn't getting them through the ceiling and won't do unless they keep their best players and add. But that doesn't happen when Chelsea buy one of them for money you can't turn down.

And the wheels keep spinning.
 

can be sorted though, especially in a new ecosystem where everyone has to follow those rules. Maybe some sort of grace period (immediate from announcement) to the end of contracts, any new contracts have to be compliant.

Big issue is when revenues drop, but wage bill remains higher and you can't sell players. Have to give them away and impact revenues further?

This touches on another issue that has not really been spoken about. Part of out issues, are that we budgeted to finish higher up the table than we did.

Is every club outside of the monied elite just expected to budget to finish bottom now, just in case? What a league eh?
 

Top