6 + 2 Point Deductions

The PSR calculation starts with the losses from the audited accounts and allows deductions such as youth academy etc. It should not be increasing the losses by adding back interest that has clearly increased because of the capital cost of building the stadium.

Again, that is the question. It was already answered once in the 2021/2022 calculation, and it was included in the PSR calculation. It doesn't matter if we got an auditor to capitalize the expense.

As for your first part, that is the first time I've seen that definition and would love to see where you got that from.
 
We should be drowning the PL in litigation as City probably will do. Absolutely amazing that we have a billionaire owner who can’t even afford decent accountants or lawyers. The defamation of the Everton brand by the PL has been enormous, never mind the impact on the integrity of the league with these points deductions. Should have sued them the second that first charge landed.
 

We should be drowning the PL in litigation as City probably will do. Absolutely amazing that we have a billionaire owner who can’t even afford decent accountants or lawyers. The defamation of the Everton brand by the PL has been enormous, never mind the impact on the integrity of the league with these points deductions. Should have sued them the second that first charge landed.

think if we was a stable club as would of
 
Seems to be never-ending.

The Merseyside club could yet face a further points deduction in relation to interest costs associated with the building of the club's new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock, though that issue is unlikely to be resolved before the end of the season.

In its written reasons the independent commission said the Premier League had asked for a five-point deduction for the club.

The commission decided that any breach of PSR justifies a three-point deduction, with an additional two points because Everton's breach of £16.6m - 15.8% above the £105m threshold - is deemed significant.

However, the commission accepted Everton's arguments for mitigation in relation to the fact the club has:

  • Already been deducted points this season
  • Suffered a loss of revenue because of the suspension of a sponsorship deal with Russian company USM
  • Made an early admission of guilt
 

Seems to be never-ending.

The Merseyside club could yet face a further points deduction in relation to interest costs associated with the building of the club's new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock, though that issue is unlikely to be resolved before the end of the season.

In its written reasons the independent commission said the Premier League had asked for a five-point deduction for the club.

The commission decided that any breach of PSR justifies a three-point deduction, with an additional two points because Everton's breach of £16.6m - 15.8% above the £105m threshold - is deemed significant.

However, the commission accepted Everton's arguments for mitigation in relation to the fact the club has:


  • Already been deducted points this season
  • Suffered a loss of revenue because of the suspension of a sponsorship deal with Russian company USM
  • Made an early admission of guilt

I'm not sure that's the case, based on the paper. Even if the interests are included., it's unlikely to change that the fact our loss was 'substantial' and wouldn't remove any of our mitigation.
 

Top