6 + 2 Point Deductions


GoldenToffee said:
Seeing as 14 (is it?) from 20 teams need to agree to new rules, surely there can be no way that any new rules brought in can benefit the 'big 6', right? Wouldn't make much sense would it for clubs agreeing to rules that make it impossible for them to ever close the gap to the bigger boys?
Click to expand...
By that logic Tories would never win an election
 
MikeH72 said:
Palace, Luton, Wolves, Bournemouth, Fulham, Forest, Sheff Utd, Burnley and Brentford aren’t interested in closing the gap.
Click to expand...
You missed off Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool and the 2 Manchester clubs who have no intention of letting anybody close the gap.

Think Chelsea, Newcastle and Villa would be the only teams to vote to remove FFP.
 

Goat said:
You missed off Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool and the 2 Manchester clubs who have no intention of letting anybody close the gap.

Think Chelsea, Newcastle and Villa would be the only teams to vote to remove FFP.
Click to expand...

Ah yeah but I was talking about the “other 14”. Goes without saying at the 6 want to pull the ladder up.
 
matty1878 said:
off topic here but seen the article on who owns each club on bbc footy page?

didn’t know PIF are worth 700-900 billion

wow
Click to expand...
Just read that... Was surprised how many teams are part of multiple ownership.

777 gonna reduce their shares in others to pay for us I wonder. Then again, only an issue if playing in Europe. So, probably not.
 
tellmema said:
Just read that... Was surprised how many teams are part of multiple ownership.

777 gonna reduce their shares in others to pay for us I wonder. Then again, only an issue if playing in Europe. So, probably not.
Click to expand...

dunno how any of it works mate lol

other then if your rich by us but looks how that’s turned out?

777 seem bad cowboys but who am i to question them aye? il just moan when we sell BMD and stay at goodison

and are in the vauxhall conference
 
GoldenToffee said:
Seeing as 14 (is it?) from 20 teams need to agree to new rules, surely there can be no way that any new rules brought in can benefit the 'big 6', right? Wouldn't make much sense would it for clubs agreeing to rules that make it impossible for them to ever close the gap to the bigger boys?
Click to expand...
The new rules will still benefit the big six, but probably to a lesser extent than they do now - I think there is a different threshold for teams not in Europe which will help close the gap slightly. So they might get voted for not because they are brilliant, fair rules, but because they are at least less bad than they are now.
 
Tony’s Carp said:
The new rules will still benefit the big six, but probably to a lesser extent than they do now - I think there is a different threshold for teams not in Europe which will help close the gap slightly. So they might get voted for not because they are brilliant, fair rules, but because they are at least less bad than they are now.
Click to expand...
The current ones aren’t benefitting them enough apparently, which is why they’re being changed.

They’re all looking over their shoulders currently, worried that they might be close to overspending. That’s the reason the rules are being changed. Not because of the likes of us and Notts Forest.
 

matty1878 said:
dunno how any of it works mate lol

other then if your rich by us but looks how that’s turned out?

777 seem bad cowboys but who am i to question them aye? il just moan when we sell BMD and stay at goodison

and are in the vauxhall conference
Click to expand...
"Impossible dear sir, unthinkable"
"Why?!"
"Because it hasn't been the Vauxhall conference for years, it's the Vanarama Conference"
 
IMG_2889.webp

why are they? lol lol lol lol
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top