5 subs next season

[Tin-Tin]

 

[number4.]

gone thankfully - would have effectively moved the "banana skin" for city and probably for Liverpool as well.

Much leveller playing field, especially given every club is going to have a lot more midweeks

 

[chrismpw]

Thank god

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

I actually didn't mind the 5 subs rule

Would have allowed us to bring more younger players on for Premier League minutes

I'm not convinced it was the big help to the top clubs that others seem to think it was either

 

[jaycee]

I actually didn't mind the 5 subs rule

Would have allowed us to bring more younger players on for Premier League minutes

I'm not convinced it was the big help to the top clubs that others seem to think it was either

Id have kept it if 2 subs were younger players,like 3 experienced 2 youth

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

Id have kept it if 2 subs were younger players,like 3 experienced 2 youth

Yes I'd be okay with that too

Would encourage clubs to give more younger players a chance

 

[number4.]

Id have kept it if 2 subs were younger players,like 3 experienced 2 youth

too subjective I think; what happens if United sign Jadon Sancho and or leave Mason Greenwood on the bench for example

 

[BigDunc'sFod]

Are they binning the "water break" as well, then?

 

[The binman chronicles]

Common sense prevails at last.

 

[summerisle]

Are they binning the "water break" as well, then?

Binned.

 

[MondayHater]

Binned.

I am surprised no one ever sponsored that. This water break is brought to you by......

 

[summerisle]

 

[PaulPowersTash]

Excellent news. There is no need whatsoever to be able to change up to 50% of your outfield
players during a game that lasts 90 minutes with a 15 minute break in the middle.
I don't think it would have particularly benefited the top clubs in fact possibly the opposite.
Clubs defending with 10 men behind the ball and playing for a draw would have used this
to slow the game down, interrupt things to run the clock down - all of which would have
been a detriment to the game and the spectators. Good decision.

 

[catcherintherye]

Excellent news. There is no need whatsoever to be able to change up to 50% of your outfield
players during a game that lasts 90 minutes with a 15 minute break in the middle.
I don't think it would have particularly benefited the top clubs in fact possibly the opposite.
Clubs defending with 10 men behind the ball and playing for a draw would have used this
to slow the game down, interrupt things to run the clock down - all of which would have
been a detriment to the game and the spectators. Good decision.

I think what it will do, is stop teams just buying ever bigger squads of top players, which is a good thing. I also think, the extended bench thing now makes little sense, so I'm glad they've pulled the carpet under that one.

Any ideas who is for or against?

 

[Alan Whittle]

I think what it will do, is stop teams just buying ever bigger squads of top players, which is a good thing. I also think, the extended bench thing now makes little sense, so I'm glad they've pulled the carpet under that one.

Any ideas who is for or against?

Guessing;
For; RS, City, Utd, Arsenal, Chelsea
Against; Everyone else.