13 points out of 10 games

Status
Not open for further replies.
Howard won the FA and League cup with United mate

Not only is he not even answering the right question, he then went and got his answer wrong. I see Gibsons trophies don't count, Cleverley's have been conveniently left off, Mori's Mirallas' and Naismith's denigrated. Bizarre.
 

Not only is he not even answering the right question, he then went and got his answer wrong. I see Gibsons trophies don't count, Cleverley's have been conveniently left off, Mori's Mirallas' and Naismith's denigrated. Bizarre.

Its a pointless thing anyway, how many trophies had scholes, giggs, beckham nevilles etc won until they won one
 
Dave. I have to say that very hypocritical. All last season and in isolated posts this season you rattled on about OUR 72 point total of 13/14 now OUR points total compared to games played is inadequate you have shifted your focus to other teams results/points totals.

What I find bizarre is why he's making this point at all. If the 4th place team take 7 points from their next 3 games and so do we, they will be on 36 points over 19 games, form which if continued over a season see you at 72 points. If we get 7 points, that sees us at 30, form that if continued gets us 60 points and 8th. So basically Dave is arguing that the team in 4th are displaying top 4 form and the team that is 'just' 6 behind, are not. Genius.
 
Dave. I have to say that very hypocritical. All last season and in isolated posts this season you rattled on about OUR 72 point total of 13/14 now OUR points total compared to games played is inadequate you have shifted your focus to other teams results/points totals.
No. I really haven't.

I had this out with your fellow Bobby-denier st domingo yesterday.
 

No. I really haven't.

I had this out with your fellow Bobby-denier st domingo yesterday.
You haven't what. What's a Bobby denier by the way? Someone who says he hasn't got a good enough points to game ratio? If that's so what total would have concrned you if 70 from 162 is adequate.
 
No. I really haven't.

I had this out with your fellow Bobby-denier st domingo yesterday.

Hi mate can you explain why your 'realistic ambition' at the start of the season has now been deemed impossible by yourself less than half way in? I'd like to know the reasons behind what has changed?

Could you also explain why your expectation of our wonderful manager is the same as that which Moyes achieved? We can move onto why you're not expecting any progress in the league after three seasons of Martinezs methods from where we were.
 
You haven't what. What's a Bobby denier by the way? Someone who says he hasn't got a good enough points to game ratio? If that's so what total would have concrned you if 70 from 162 is adequate.

Are you only taking his points to games ratio from a certain time Ian to aid a point or are you a bit daft in the head?
 
This post is laughable. If you want to find any excuse for mediocrity go ahead, this site is full of them. You seem intent on warping every argument far beyond what it was originally about in the process attributing views to me that I've never held to make my opinion appear ridiculous.

Seeing as you either struggle to read or deliberately misrepresent arguments, here it is again, one poster said that this group of players should not have any pressure put on them whatsoever as they are not able to perform under it. I countered that by saying that why should this be the case? You then completely derailed the whole argument with a bizarre work based analogy then that embarassing last post which is both erroneous, includes disrespect for other leagues and competitions (yeah the copa libertadores is 'nothing'), and actually does not even counter the point I was making. Where did I say that the young players were surrounded by winners? I didn't, you'd have just liked me to say it to fit your bizarre extrapolated argument.

I ask you then, returning to the original argument that you sabotaged like a clumsy elephant, do you think that it is acceptable that Everton football club has a squad of players that are apparently incapable of performing under any pressure whatsoever? (An answer without changing the subject or your usual brain bending word jumble would be appreciated).

I think you are far too rigid in here mate. Blinkered. Whether it's the view you hold or the debate at hand.

Let's rewind...

If players can't perform under pressure they shouldn't be at Everton.

This is the part which I disagreed with. I then used the example of someone who works in an office.

You obviously accepted it as a response but disagreed with it. Fair play:

Last time I checked we were one of the biggest sides in English football not a nursery or an academy for the elite. If Martinez's strategy involves getting young world class players in then that is fine but that is a choice he has made. If he's done it as the best way to return us to success that is great but quite why fans have taken that to mean we now have a ready made excuse as to why we can no longer compete for anything I don't know. Rom Barkley Stones McCarthy are all internationals who have been in the first team for 3 seasons and in the prem longer (Stones excepted). Apart from Del (who is a bit raw) Where exactly is the need for all these kids gloves? Howard Baines Jags Coleman Barry Kone? This might have washed in 13/14 but this is not a team of teenagers. It is a squad of elite players who have been together for 2 and a half years with most of them being vastly experienced. Again, if they can't deal with pressure, why are we paying to have them here?

Using your own logic, do you therefore put our underperformance over the last 18 months solely on these young developing players? What about the other 7 in the first 11? Do they just get excused from all games with any pressure as well?

The bit in bold is the key here. To me it says 'we are a big club, we expect big performances, title wins, cup wins etc". Is that not fair? To do those things, specifically win the big prize - titles, but also the next step down, to challenge for the top 4, you need consistency, power players in the dressing room who HAVE wons things and can teach these fledglings on the job how/what to do through a long hard season.

My response simply is, we may be a traditionally big club, however very few of our players have won major honours. My point regarding the Funes Mori is justified as the european leagues are the biggest and best in the world. That surely isnt up for debate is it?

So my final post to you was a whistle-stop tour of players as I tried to recollect who in our team should be guiding these players to consistency, to the top 4. We have about 3 'winners' dont we. Howard with Man Utd, Barry with City and Gibson with Man Utd. It isnt enough. Instead we have to hope these quality young players figure it out for themselves. This isnt ideal, granted, but you play the cards you're dealt with. The winners of this world cost £20mil plus if you want them at an age where they can also make a difference on the pitch themselves.

So to answer your question I think it is completely understandable that we have a squad of players who struggle for consistency and subsequently struggle to challenge for top honours and league places when its made up of kids with quality and players who have never shown any consistency in their careers thus far including winning honours.
 

You haven't what. What's a Bobby denier by the way? Someone who says he hasn't got a good enough points to game ratio? If that's so what total would have concrned you if 70 from 162 is adequate.
It's you: someone who from the off didn't want the manager in here, was piped right down two season's back; resurfaced last season; departed to your cave again this season until a few weeks ago when we suffered a string of 3-3 and 1-1 defeats.

Lol.
 
Are you only taking his points to games ratio from a certain time Ian to aid a point or are you a bit daft in the head?
Why get personal? It just cheapens the quality of your posts. You'll notice I try not to join in with that.

The reason i have used from the start of last season to this current day is I think that's a fair amount of time to gauge our form, from next season I'll use only this current season and whatever form is coming our way then, unless my argument becomes weakens by better form, in which case we shall ALL be a lot happier. If you want I can use all of Martinez PL totals as a manager, to which you will argue that he didn't have the same calibre of player, then I will use the argument that this squad is much better and more experienced than 13/14. Then the cycle of argument will start again. With the same points being made.
 
It's you: someone who from the off didn't want the manager in here, was piped right down two season's back; resurfaced last season; departed to your cave again this season until a few weeks ago when we suffered a string of 3-3 and 1-1 defeats.

Lol.
Again that's not true. I have been posting on a regular basis all season, and thise proceeding, you have started telling a lot of lies to suit your agenda recently. Shame, stick to the facts. Interesting that yet again you failed to comment on OUR points tally yet couldn't wait to make mention of UTD and Spurs.

lol.

Again is 70 from the past 162 good enough for this squad?

Not expecting an answer.
 
Why get personal? It just cheapens the quality of your posts. You'll notice I try not to join in with that.

The reason i have used from the start of last season to this current day is I think that's a fair amount of time to gauge our form, from next season I'll use only this current season and whatever form is coming our way then, unless my argument becomes weakens by better form, in which case we shall ALL be a lot happier. If you want I can use all of Martinez PL totals as a manager, to which you will argue that he didn't have the same calibre of player, then I will use the argument that this squad is much better and more experienced than 13/14. Then the cycle of argument will start again. With the same points being made.

It was a genuine question Ian.

For simplification and to fit in with popular stats based websites why don't you quote it from his first game in charge of Everton? Thats the point where we are all judging him from, not his days at Wigan because frankly who gives two hoots what he did there? When he's gone, either pushed out or leaves through his own choice, it won't be an indiscriminate amount of games people judge him on when they look at his achievements at Everton, it will be from the whole time he spent here.

That's the fair and logical way, maybe you just can't be fair or logical were Martinez is concerned?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top