FTY
Player Valuation: £80m
Celik on loan now hopefully2 down
Celik on loan now hopefully2 down
Yeah not straight awayNothing of what’s been done helps PSR.
The shares haven’t actually been issued as far as I am aware, they have just provided for an ability to issue the shares at some point in the future. There is no commitment to do so.But it is happening or it wouldn’t have been reported
Sack of signing a right back and plough all of our money into buying accountants.It’s unreal. They need to look at what Chelsea have done and get inventive.
Is there any other industry where shareholders are actively prevented from investing in their businesses?Yeah not straight away
It gives us access to more funds and investment, and will help with the longer term PSR position. So we will have money to spend, but only when the PSR position allows it. Another example of why the rules are a nonsense.
Wumming of the highest quality? I’m not so sure.
He’s picked his theme, that being we are the Friedkins 2nd best toy and they highly favour Roma.
He’s got no proof of this and cannot offer anything in the way of substance to back it up.
Most normal people can see that they have owned Roma longer and are more bedded in there and had a mountain of crap to sort out to even get Everton functioning correctly after the mess of BK and Moshiri.
It’s boring.
He had to take a stand early which he did and as usual is now ruining every thread with his tedious conspiracy theory that only he buys into.
I think the best way to look at it is that PSR is all about profit and loss (ie. the revenue clubs make and the amount of it they spend), whereas shares impact the balance sheet - they're not revenue, they're capital, so they don't directly count in PSR terms, unless the extra capital is invested to help clubs increase revenue.Newcastle demonstrate this better than anyone. They have owners who have more spending power than all of the other Premier League owners combined. But with PSR they can’t spend it. They could buy any player and offer any amount of wages but the rules do not allow it. This is how much the league is set up to prevent another Man City from upsetting the status quo.
The original poster this response was written to was largely correct saying the share resolution is not yet significant but this response could also become correct.Not sure it’s a none event. Think it effectively helps with cash flow. Whilst it may not help with PSR (i don’t know if it does or doesn’t), it would allow us to offer more cash upfront which may make deals easier to get over the line.
100%. Put him on ignore and do just that.It’s not Dave that ruins the threads tbf, it’s all the people that STILL reply to him, even though they are well aware he’s just a WUM. They stop then he stops.
I wish we had him. Instead, Everton have spent a lot of cash on a player who looks to be thelooks to be for the future when we want PL proven goal scorer now.
Yes they raised the draw bridge after CityNewcastle demonstrate this better than anyone. They have owners who have more spending power than all of the other Premier League owners combined. But with PSR they can’t spend it. They could buy any player and offer any amount of wages but the rules do not allow it. This is how much the league is set up to prevent another Man City from upsetting the status quo.
They aren't prevented from making the share investment. The club has to follow PSR rules which mean that the money might not be available for various things such as use on the playing squad.Is there any other industry where shareholders are actively prevented from investing in their businesses?