The Danish player could have one leg and be partially blind but he's the obvious choiceI have no idea. Just think Longstaff is crap and he is a sub at Newcastle. Ndidi rejected us before and is almost 29 and has regressed.

The Danish player could have one leg and be partially blind but he's the obvious choiceI have no idea. Just think Longstaff is crap and he is a sub at Newcastle. Ndidi rejected us before and is almost 29 and has regressed.
That explains it.Ahh you are forgetting the interest they had earned on it!!!![]()
I have no idea. Just think Longstaff is crap and he is a sub at Newcastle. Ndidi rejected us before and is almost 29 and has regressed.
a bit of perspective.I know this is nothing to do with us directly but just saw this. [Poor language removed] awful.
Diego Jota passes away in car accident
He isn't mate, his numbers are worse than Garners and he needs replacing. CM needs to be an upgrade not another sticking plaster/kick the can down the road type. CM and RW were always the key positions for me.Newcastle have a fantastic midfield though, so being sub is no stick to beat him with, lad is a decent (not great but solid) player.
Just saw this. Very, very sad.I know this is nothing to do with us directly but just saw this. [Poor language removed] awful.
Diego Jota passes away in car accident
Buying and loaning could have same cost from a PSR perspective, difference is when you buy you have an asset available for a new contract or future sale, a loan is cost with no underlying asset. (i.e. the loan fee could be similar cost as the amortisation.)Dave, hand on heart mate, do you honestly believe we, after all our financial issues, would drop Ā£30m on a player just to loan him out? Come on youāre better than that
A massive success with Kroldrup too.Danish player from Serie A, you say?
That worked out great last season...
I presume you've seen a lot of Genoa to say he's the obvious choice?
Send on a copy of the budget when you get a chance, cheersOne issue:we donāt have 30 million euro to spare.
The issue with Longstaff is that he is a little bit of everything. Box to box with lots of energy, not great on the ball but decent defensively.Newcastle have a fantastic midfield though, so being sub is no stick to beat him with, lad is a decent (not great but solid) player.
Suppose it depends on your pov. I just find it yet another in a long line of embarrassments.I think its a good thing as they would only have been stop gaps and it shows we were unwilling to pay over the odds like we would have done previously. Quite refreshing really...